jazzfish: Jazz Fish: beret, sunglasses, saxophone (Default)
[personal profile] jazzfish
There's not much else that needs to be said, but why let that stop me.

The decision to terminate a pregnancy involves two people: the woman whose pregnancy it is, and Nobody Else.

Abortion clinic protesters and firebombers, and other such domestic terrorists acting in the name of saving unborn babies, would be better served attacking in vitro fertilization clinics. Of course, if they did that they wouldn't get to feel all superior by shaming the dirty sluts.

Not that the anti-choicers have any semblance of moral consistency in any case.

Really, the minute you make an exception "in cases of rape or incest" you've given up on the whole "it's a child not a choice" nonsense. Murder is murder; why are you punishing an unborn child for having a rapist for a father?

Ezra Klein is a smart guy. I'm happy to see him attack the "abortion is icky" thinking that pervades a great deal of pro-choice dialogue.

Happy anniversary, RvW. May you see many more.

Blog for Choice Day - January 22, 2007

Date: 2007-01-24 04:29 pm (UTC)
ext_125536: A pink castle on a green hill against a black background. A crescent moon above. (grebe/thoughtful/quiet)
From: [identity profile] nixve.livejournal.com
So... the idea of a woman shooting someone who is threatening her life, home and livelihood is just fine, but the idea of a woman ending a pregnancy that is threatening her life, home and livelihood is somehow icky and shameful?

Date: 2007-01-24 04:41 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Where did you get the concept of icky and shameful in the comment to which you just responded?

Date: 2007-01-24 04:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vvalkyri.livejournal.com
Where did you get the concept of icky and shameful in the comment to which you just responded?

Date: 2007-01-24 05:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laughin.livejournal.com
No. You must not have read everything I wrote. Go back and read.

(Stupid LJ not taking my comments - I apologize if this gets posted multiple times)

I am pro-choice, but I don't like abortion and I think that is the way many people are.

My niece had an abortion and it upset me greatly.

But this is a fight that neither side will "win" because each side is looking at the issue as choice or life. Does that make sense?


I can get into this huge discussion about pro-choice being a poor term for some of the people who believe in a woman's right to choose abortion, but not a woman's right to choose things like, how to protect herself (gun control), and such. But I guess calling yourself "Pro-choice in cases of a woman deciding to have an abortion or not" is a little too long.

Date: 2007-01-24 05:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laughin.livejournal.com
By the way, in case you forgot, I HAD an abortion or so it was called on my medical paperwork when I had an ectopic pregnancy and had to end the pregnancy because:

1. It was not viable.
2. I could have lost a tube or died.

It was not shameful, but it was icky in the sense that I wanted the child and it ended up putting me in the psych hospital.

Date: 2007-01-24 05:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laughin.livejournal.com
Oh hell. Sorry to get so emotional about that. Sorry for the above nastiness.

Profile

jazzfish: Jazz Fish: beret, sunglasses, saxophone (Default)
Tucker McKinnon

Most Popular Tags

Adventures in Mamboland

"Jazz Fish, a saxophone playing wanderer, finds himself in Mamboland at a critical phase in his life." --Howie Green, on his book Jazz Fish Zen

Yeah. That sounds about right.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags