(no subject)
Jan. 29th, 2003 09:43 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
jazzfishGah. Rant about Tcon for ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
vt_komainu composed and wiped, because I am a twit. The short version consisted of "I'm sorry, I forget that there are people who are still idealistic about Tcon, but my experiences as staff were unpleasant. Ask Emily for more details, although she'll talk your ear off."
Reading went decently well. Attendance consisted of the Tuesday Night Music Club plus Ross and (later) Shawn Lassiter. Stuff was read. It was cool.
In retrospect it's just as well that I didn't finish Kierkegaard for today; Bliss is sick. Not that I'd be able to get back to sleep, though.
vt_komainu composed and wiped, because I am a twit. The short version consisted of "I'm sorry, I forget that there are people who are still idealistic about Tcon, but my experiences as staff were unpleasant. Ask Emily for more details, although she'll talk your ear off."Reading went decently well. Attendance consisted of the Tuesday Night Music Club plus Ross and (later) Shawn Lassiter. Stuff was read. It was cool.
In retrospect it's just as well that I didn't finish Kierkegaard for today; Bliss is sick. Not that I'd be able to get back to sleep, though.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-29 11:50 am (UTC)In terms of Con itself, Panels are personally my biggest gripe. Panels are historically poorly-attended, with the notable exceptions of the two midnight ones, but staff sees them as the Whole Point Of Con. Gaming is exiled to Festhall (although admittedly there's not much of a better place to put it in Red Lion), and Spiel, despite high attendance and requests for a quieter room than FH, is told "Go live with gaming or get a hotel room." (Part of the Spiel problem this year may well stem from Nathan being a dork and not doing his bloody job.)
Re:
Date: 2003-01-29 11:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-01-29 12:29 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-01-29 12:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-01-29 01:19 pm (UTC)Mainly: We're Spiel. We bring games someplace, we play them. The minimal politics and minimal effort involved in that is a reason Spiel exists and continues to exist. It requires games, a place, a communication vector, and a quorum of people. That's all. Our "official leaders" are required to do only slightly more than your average slug, most of it throwing out irrelevant university mailings, and we like it that way. I've been in and around enough other clubs imploding, alienating members, bifurcating, stopping and starting up again, and the cause has always been either the work involved, or the politics of the work involved. I like it that Spiel can avoid these things, but it does make it difficult to interface with Technicon's facet of reality, where 3-6 months of heavy planning end in 3 days of event, versus around 5 minutes per person of casual planning -> several hours or more of event. End rant.
And complicating factor: A significant number of Spiel-attendees / Spiel-officers in attendance at the time were also involved in Con at that time and had other ideas for uses for that particular room / any similarly sized room. Certainly those people weren't going to fight tooth and nail for that room to be taken away from, well, them, and the rest of us were even less likely to start fighting tooth and nail *against* other people in the room we tolerate reasonably well. (Note that we are apathetic in the first place.)
So in sum: If we have a room, we'll use it. If we have to engage in politics or do work to get said room, we're probably not interested. The grumbling you hear is just the natural grumbling of those who would prefer to have a thing fall into their lap and are disappointed when it doesn't. The people saying, "I will boycott Technicon because they are rat bastards" are generally those who have tried to care and make effort and been chewed up and spit out by the politics, rather than those of us who have chosen not to try. As one of the latter, I give T-Con my $28, I get a college reunion with some provided entertainment, I'm basically happy. I can understand very much why the others aren't, and that's why I don't get involved in the first place.
--Kayla
no subject
Date: 2003-01-29 01:57 pm (UTC)I will agree with pretty much all of your post except for the above. It is my opinion that there is very little politics involved and most of it is simply due to personal issues with individuals that get blown out of proportion.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-29 02:13 pm (UTC)*shrug* You say tomato, I say evil red fruit. If the way to get things done is to ego-stroke Certain Individuals, then that sounds suspiciously like politics to me.
Devil's advocate for panels
You'll hopefully forgive me for intruding on this one, but it's got me to thinking. :)
In terms of Con itself, Panels are personally my biggest gripe. Panels are historically poorly-attended, with the notable exceptions of the two midnight ones, but staff sees them as the Whole Point Of Con.
They're not? *just kidding* "Historically" is a bit broad of a word, since it really doesn't allow for objective measure. Panel attendance over the last 20 years of Tcon: traditionally strong. Panel attendance over the past four to five years: a bit spottier. There have been some panels that have gotten a strong response, but these tend to be the new, nifty panels. (the Battlebots panel last year, for instance) Some of the traditional ones just don't work anymore.
The problem is that it's sometimes hard to find the balance. You have to plan for those fen that are there to do nothing but game, those that are planning on being couch potatoes in the video rooms, those that are LARPers, and those that flit from place to place like butterflies with ADD. If you push one section too hard, you risk alienating support that the convention needs.
Gaming is exiled to Festhall (although admittedly there's not much of a better place to put it in Red Lion), and Spiel, despite high attendance and requests for a quieter room than FH, is told "Go live with gaming or get a hotel room."
Sadly, this is a problem with the function space. If we were back in Donaldson Brown (in the grand days when they weren't offices and we all got along), I think that Spiel would have a much easier time of it. However, since there currently isn't another place aroundthat can handle our requirements and not charge us an arm, a leg, and the con chair's first-born, we're stuck with the awkward spacing at RL. As it stands, decisions have to be made (see that balance thing up there) and it looks like quieter gaming gets the fuzzy end of the lollypop more often than not.
Now, here's an odd thought: has Spiel ever run panels before? I mean more than just "here's an overview of gaming and our club". More that sort of "Here's this new game: let's walk you through a few scenarios for a few hours and if you want to play longer, we'll be up in the Festhalle"? Admittedly, my head for past programming is fuzzy, but I've been relegating myself to the video room. (It's safer. :) )
An alternate is perhaps a compromise on room payment, where either Tcon and Spiel split the cost or it could be a sponsorship sort of deal like, "if you can bring in this many attendees, the room is free." That may sound a little outlandish, but rooms and budget don't always cuddle up.
Just a few thoughts -- take with appropriate salt lick. :)
Re: Devil's advocate for panels
Date: 2003-01-29 02:25 pm (UTC)The problem is that it's sometimes hard to find the balance. (snip)
This is very true. But I feel like social boardgaming (as distinct from role-playing or wargaming) has had a bigger presence at Tech in the past few years, and that it can be a draw at Tcon much like any given panel. And last year I think it was; there were *always* (except for 2-10 AM) upwards of a half dozen people in the room, and not the same people.
The lack of room this year can apparently be traced back to Kayla's post above.
Sadly, this is a problem with the function space.
Agreed, in a big way. (Then I say "Maybe it's time to leave B-burg" and someone says "We're here for the students and the money that Tech will give us" and I say "That sounds shortsighted" and then we agree to disagree, as I have neither the time nor inclination to research the budget situation and draw my own conclusions.)
On Spiel panels: this was kicked around a couple years ago. It never got anywhere that year due to apathy; it was never revived because, when Emily submitted write-ups for scheduled games/tournaments, they were ignored and/or rewritten for program book, and it seemed like a lot of effort to go to just to be ignored. Plus programming has, in the past couple of years, been done at the last minute by con staff, and no one on our end was willing to figure out who it was, figure out who on our end was willing to run panels on what, and get all that information to the person doing programming *and* convince them to add it in.
The room copay is also a neat idea, and we might well be up for that next year. Depending on how the politics on our end shake out, of course.
Again, thanks for your input!
Re: Devil's advocate for panels
Date: 2003-01-29 06:53 pm (UTC)As for leaving town, it's not short-sighted at all, if you understand the actual goals of the con. Technicon isn't supposed to grow into a massive ubercon with thousands of attendees. We're not trying to make money. We don't want to become a corporate entity or an offical nonprofit. We're trying to stay under the radar of the IRS, and under the umbrella of Tech's tax status. If the goal is to make a good business, we should start from scratch with a new name (for back-tax reasons), incorporate, elect a board, etc. Or you could just try to help Rising Star grow, since it's already setup for all these things that Technicon isn't supposed to be. This is my understanding of why Tcon won't leave (besides the things you said, of course).