![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
. . . wait, Technicon, in addition to being in McBryde instead of an actual convention center, is shutting down at eleven PM?
I want to go this year: a couple days of solid gaming, plus Mr Martin and Ursula Vernon. It's growing more and more difficult to justify the time and expense, though.
I want to go this year: a couple days of solid gaming, plus Mr Martin and Ursula Vernon. It's growing more and more difficult to justify the time and expense, though.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-12 03:10 pm (UTC)Please, for the love of god, tell me what the solution is!
no subject
Date: 2008-03-12 03:12 pm (UTC)except possibly the Ramada, which the current Technicon administration refuses to consider
Answered your own question, I believe.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-12 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-12 03:32 pm (UTC)It's hard not to feel like the problem isn't so much a lack of available space as it is pigheadedness on the part of specific members of Constaff, and it's too easy to generalize away from the "specific members of" part.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-12 03:53 pm (UTC)If I had known we were going to do things in this fashion this year, I'd have requested or possibly demanded that we change the name of the event, much like Rising Star did the first year they held the con at Bluefield State.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-12 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-12 08:55 pm (UTC)Well, that's pretty much what he said. In part, because there's a point where leadership decisions actually need to be made, and waffling needs to stop. I distinctly remember telling John he should say something to that effect (if you don't like it, replace me) last fall or so. Unfortunately, while I'm not terribly thrilled with how things are going, I don't think there's anyone else who's able and willing (the latter of those being the real problem) to do a better job, so here we are.
I think that if people stop trying to compare this to past TCons (hard, I know, since it's being called, well, TCon), it'll go off much better. Yes, far, far, far from perfect, but there's still plenty of capacity for fun to be had.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 01:20 am (UTC)Problem is, it was advertised as Technicon, but it sounds like it'll be more along the lines of I-fest^2. Saying "Judge it on its own merits!" to people who are interested in coming for specific things that aren't going to be there is kind of rude.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 02:21 am (UTC)Also, you could try to think of it as more of a retro TCon, before it moved off campus, since it was held on-campus for a number of years.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-12 07:04 pm (UTC)I also didn't realize there was VT funding that would be lost if the con moved to Roanoke. Oi.
(Edited for typos)
no subject
Date: 2008-03-12 07:59 pm (UTC)McBryde was, in John's opinion, making the best of a bad situation. And when you think about the fact that T-Con's job is to expose students to sci-fi in addition to providing a place for VTSFFC alumni to meet, it makes sense.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-12 11:50 pm (UTC)If the con staff *does* look at TCon as just a way to expose students to scifi and for the VTSFFC to meet, then it's going to wind up Inivisifest very soon. I don't think they do, though, which makes it all the more surprising that there was a hotel option that was discarded.
As far as the best of a bad situation, I guess it's how you look at the bad situation. Which is worse--dealing with the Ramada, or having attendance kneecapped? Attendance means money, money means Tcon 26. Location makes people happy or upset, and happy or upset determines reputation. Reputation helps determine attendance. And so on.
Maybe the Ramada really was the worst of the two; I wasn't there, so I don't know. I just know that the only reason I've heard for all the regulars not attending this year was the lack of a hotel site.
As for making it more convenient for students to go, that's a matter of who gets convenienced and who gets inconvenienced. Someone's going to get the fuzzy end of the lollipop. Either the students have to rent rooms or work out transportation, or the visitors have to commute and hope they can get a parking space within a quarter-mile of the con.
+1 Insightful
Date: 2008-03-13 01:00 am (UTC)One small nit: financially, they're so much better off having it in McBryde it isn't even close to funny, because the hotel is just that expensive. At least it was last time I was involved in Tcon, and that was at the Red Lion. I imagine they could have fifty people walk through the door at $10/person in McBryde and be in the black.
Re: +1 Insightful
Date: 2008-03-13 01:16 am (UTC)I imagine they could have fifty people walk through the door at $10/person in McBryde and be in the black.
That's definitely one silver lining. Hopefully they'll make enough off of admissions to keep the momentum going for Tcon 26.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 12:57 am (UTC)Better than no hotel at all.
there's no convenient way to get students there who want to go
I can't really argue with this point.
negotiating with their manager was insanity-inducing
I'm sorry to hear that but it's not a reason to say "no ramada."
McBryde was, in John's opinion, making the best of a bad situation.
If he started from the position of "no ramada" then I can see where he's coming from. That don't make it right.
T-Con's job is to expose students to sci-fi in addition to providing a place for VTSFFC alumni to meet
What Kay said.