jazzfish: book and quill and keyboard and mouse (Media Log)
J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

This is the best of them so far, I think. There is Plot, there is Character, there is Harry being treated like an adult, there is a dearth of pointless digression. Dumbledore is irritatingly secretive with his blackened hand, but other than that people are pretty open with each other about what's going on.

Yay Snape finally gets to teach DADA! (Why did D not just promote him last year and save us all the trouble of dealing with Umbridge?) Evil Snape is pretty believable, I must say. I'm sticking with my 'he's really a good guy' theory, as implausible as it seems given the end of the book. I base this solely on D's "Go get Snape" order.

Good to see Draco do something other than 'be an annoying little git.' Angst-filled Tonks doesn't work for me. Maybe if we'd seen more of her in this book it would have.

The Half-Blood Prince bit is the weakest thing about the book. A neat idea but poorly integrated with everything else.

I very nearly threw the book across the room when Harry broke up with Ginny "for her own good."

Lots of zooming around doing cool things, and uncovering bits and pieces of backstory, and general good times. Enjoyable.




J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows

In which (almost) everyone dies.

This wouldn't have been so bad if there had been any sort of precedent in the books at /all/ for this kind of mass slaughter. That's not the tone we'd been getting, though, so it feels exceptionally jarring. (Okay, and also I'm bitter at some of the who lives and who dies decisions that were made.)

Individual episodes were good. The raid on the Ministry in particular was made of yay. And the plot's alright except for the totally random element introduced that there was absolutely no hint of previously. Do not talk to me about how JKR has had so much awesome planned out from the very beginning. Evil Snape was pretty clearly invented between five and six, and the Hallows popped into existence between six and seven. (As did D's Mysterious Past.)

Speaking of which, the Redemption of Snape was rather unsatisfying. Mostly because, well, what good does it do /him/? Dramatically, hearing about it in backstory instead of having him tell (or, preferably, show) just doesn't work. Compare with the Malfoys, who actually became barely sympathetic towards the end.

"All the Slytherins are evil" is just lazy writing. I've thought this since book 5. Having one or two of them join the impromptu DADA lessons, and then having one of those stay behind, would have improved matters immeasurably. As it is, "all the houses have to work together! (except Slytherin.)" Remind me again why they still /have/ houses in the epilogue?

O yes, the epilogue. A bigger waste of paper I cannot conceive of. Absolutely the only thing of value there was the suggestion that the feud between Gryffindor and Slytherin, personified in Harry's and Draco's kids, would continue. Bleh and double bleh.

Mostly disappointing. Worth reading to wrap things up but doesn't stand on its own legs at all.

And now, off to read the comments on Making Light.
jazzfish: book and quill and keyboard and mouse (Media Log)
J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

Ah, the Ugly Blue Book at last. In which people keep secrets from the main characters for no reason, with predictably disastrous results. Such as Harry turning into a ball of repressed teenage wizard rage. At least he's got a good sulking partner in Sirius.

Oh look, a bloody /psycho/ house-elf. This is not an improvement.

You know, at the point where the first book was suddenly starting to develop a plot, this one is still mucking about with the trumped-up Wizengamot trial.

"Gryffindors get busted for no reason while Slytherins skate free" has been a running theme since midway through book 1, and it got old by three-quarters of the way through book 1. Maybe it's the rampant abuses of authority by every single character (with the surprising exception of McGonagall), but that sort of thing is exceedingly grating this time around. Or maybe it's just that there's more of it and it's more blatant. (Has no one in Quidditch ever heard of sportsmanship?)

Harry/Cho is handled pretty well. I like Tonks, and I like that Moody is not the same as he was last book. And when did Ginny Weasley become a real character? Dumbledore, too. Wow.

Oddly it's not the glimpse into Snape's past that makes me like him better; it's his reaction to Harry discovering it.

Umbridge ended up too over-the-top, but then her final fate was pretty over-the-top as well. Bleh. Glad to see the back of her.

Decent but not 850 pages worth of decent.
jazzfish: book and quill and keyboard and mouse (Media Log)
J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

Oh no, more house-elves.

Oh dear God no, more Dobby the terminally annoying plot device.

Hermione gets to play a parody of everyone who's ever campaigned to improve working conditions for slaves and near-slaves. Color me unimpressed.

Onward. The book's alright; the plot is back to "things happen to Harry" rather than "Harry does things" (as happened in books 2 and 3), but everyone gets some much-needed depth to their character. Well, except for Draco, but what can you do. (It is bloody obvious that short of one or both of them dying, Ron and Hermione are going to end up together.)

The Tri-Wizard Tournament was more interesting than Quidditch. I believe this statement is known as "damning with faint praise." The maze failed to convince me at all, and we only see Harry's segment with the dragons so there's not much of interest there. The underwater bit worked well, I thought.

The DADA teachers are getting more and more personality as the series goes on. If this trend continues I expect the one for book 7 to utterly dominate the action. (If it finally gets to be Snape, so much the better. That seems unlikely given certain revelations about his past in this book, but one never knows.)

Still worth reading. I think 2 is still my favorite so far; a second read of the series may well change that, of course.
jazzfish: book and quill and keyboard and mouse (Media Log)
J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Do I get in trouble if I say I liked the movie better? I mean, even apart from having Gary Oldman in it. Tighter plot, better script ("You tell those spiders, Ron"), more showing not telling (e.g. Harry seeing Peter on the map instead of hearing about him from Lupin). More interesting things with the time-travel sequence. Less Quidditch. It's good stuff.

If I didn't already know about the time twister I would be throwing this book against the wall in frustration. The writer's job is, to paraphrase Gene Wolfe, to tell me something really cool. It's not to taunt me with how much more the writer knows about the world than I do. Dude, it's /your/ world. Of course you know more about it than I do. /Tell/ me how awesome it is, don't just give me impossibilities whose explanations are being kept secret for the sake of secrecy.

While we're on the subject of throwing the book against the wall, Draco Malfoy nearly got me there as well. (Another point in the movie's favor: the scene where Hermione punches him out.) Yes, it is totally in character for him to milk his "injury" for all he can and then some. Doesn't mean I have to enjoy reading about it.

Lupin is a better character in the book than in the movie, granted. And the movie could have done with actually explaining who Mooney, Wormtail, Padfoot, and Prongs were. (Which plot-point was a rather nice touch.)

Onward to book 4, which I expect to be better than the movie, since the movie had a distinct lack of Gary Oldman.
jazzfish: book and quill and keyboard and mouse (Media Log)
J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone

Having seen the third movie, I did a double-take when I read early in chapter 1 that Hagrid had borrowed Sirius Black's motorcycle to deliver young Harry, and neither Dumbledore nor McGonagall batted an eye.

This three-hundred page book has roughly sixty pages of plot, fifty of which are the last fifty pages of the book. Another 50-100 are devoted to trips through the Departments of Backstory and Exposition. The rest is, um, background noise and irrelevant stuff happening. You know. World-building. It's alright but I much prefer my world-building to have a point to it.

Anyone who believes that Severus Snape is a bad guy needs to reread the Two Big Expositions (with Quirrell and Dumbledore) at the end of this book.

Fluff, but fun fluff. In defence of quite a lot of editors, I wouldn't have bought it for my publishing house either.



J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets

Much better. The plot is evenly distributed throughout the book, and there's more of it this time.

Dobby is a seriously irritating plot device and should have been edited out. He provides foreshadowing (there are better ways), screws around with a Quidditch match (o noz!), and provides a reason for the car to be in the forest so it can be a machina ex dea with the spiders. Bleh.

It's amazing how that one scene with Lucius Malfoy makes Draco understandable, and almost sympathetic.

I am unconvinced by the appointment of the obviously incompetent Lockhart as DADA teacher.

For some reason the 'let's disguise ourselves so Draco can tell us important plot information' scene really grates on me. It feels like lazy writing, and I don't know why. The sword randomly popping out of the Sorting Hat was also deus-ex-machina-like.

Again, fluff, but fun fluff, and a bit more substantial this time.

Profile

jazzfish: Jazz Fish: beret, sunglasses, saxophone (Default)
Tucker McKinnon

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Adventures in Mamboland

"Jazz Fish, a saxophone playing wanderer, finds himself in Mamboland at a critical phase in his life." --Howie Green, on his book Jazz Fish Zen

Yeah. That sounds about right.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags