I manage the CEO’s horrible nephew

Feb. 10th, 2026 05:29 pm
[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

A reader writes:

I’m managing a difficult employee, “Felix.” Felix has been at my company for five years now. He also happens to be the CEO’s nephew.

His performance was never good, but it’s gotten steadily worse. His work frequently has mistakes, he is unreachable for large stretches of the day, and he pushes back on any feedback I give him. At one point, he yelled in my face when I pointed out a repeated problem with his work, saying that he “didn’t respect” my feedback.

I’ve documented these issues extensively. I’ve talked to HR repeatedly about putting him on a PIP or even terminating him outright. They say that Felix is unhappy and actively job-searching and that they will work with him to set an end date. Things came to a head at the end of last year, during Felix’s performance review. I gave him poor marks on attitude, work quality, and communication, and he once again yelled at me and told me that my review was unfair and said that the whole team thought I was a jerk. With my HR rep on the call. Who again told me that he was probably going to leave soon on his own.

What should I do now? Should I keep pushing to fire him? I’ve been trying to make it work, but I’m at the end of my rope.

I answer this question — and two others — over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here.

Other questions I’m answering there today include:

  • How can I make sure my team doesn’t organize a gift for me?
  • Hiring a friend’s employee

The post I manage the CEO’s horrible nephew appeared first on Ask a Manager.

[syndicated profile] smbc_comics_feed

Posted by Zach Weinersmith



Click here to go see the bonus panel!

Hovertext:
In the real life version, you just get extremely emotional ads for Fritos.


Today's News:
[syndicated profile] howtobeawerewolf_feed

New comic!

Vote over on TWC to see Vincent being confused

Follow me on Blue Sky if you're so inclined!

I promise that Ginger didn't plan to block their makeout sesh on the couch, she just kind of wanted to watch this horrible movie and hoped they wouldn't mind. She was raised in a creepy house in the woods, after all. (And so was Aubrey.)

I made biko just for full legitimacy for this page lol. And also because it looked delicious and I didn't want to pass up an opportunity to make a dessert. I really like it, but I wish the Filipino place near me offered it on the menu or something so I could try a more legit version. I don't have any banana leaves (I could probably get some somewhere in Chicago, but I wasn't going to go out of my way for this experiment), and I can tell that would bring more to the vibe. I also only have the Thai glutinous sweet rice, and I feel like that's maybe not quite the right kind. I've always made it in the microwave to generally pretty good success, because the alternative is steaming it after soaking it for hours, and I don't have time for all that. The short grain Japanese sticky rice I have on hand didn't seem to be the right kind either. Regardless, turned out good! I posted some photos on my Instagram stories, though they're nothing to write home about lol. I'll eat anything that involves rice and coconut milk, frankly.

Also, a quick kitten update, because someone mentioned it yesterday! They're doing well! I found a good home with a friend of a friend for two of the kittens, and last report is that they battle it out for who gets pet first, because this whole litter loves affection. I kept the two grey boy kittens and they're getting along with my cats great and they're possibly the sweetest cats I've ever owned. They really enjoy tipping over my houseplants and dragging all the dirt out onto my carpet, which I'm not thrilled with, but I can manage. The mama is still in my garage. I've got an oil heater in there, so it's a nice temperature, and she plays with her toys and eats catnip and naps in her warm box. I need to catch her, which will be traumatic for everyone, and get her spayed. Hopefully next month when it's warm, because then if she cannot adapt to slowly being introduced to the inside cat life, I can safely let her back outside. I think she'll come around. I plan to keep her in the enclosure I had the kittens in so she has a safe place to learn to be inside and learn to be around me for as long as she needs.


In the meantime, please follow/support me on Patreon if you'd like to see art that I'm working on ahead of time, because that is mostly what I'm doing with my time off anyway. You can also download the Volume 1 ebook and the Kickstarter digital artbook, plus see whatever I'm working on ahead of time.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tote bags, hoodies, tshirts, prints and mugs are all available in the Hivemill store! The hoodies are unisex sizing, but the tshirts run rather fitted, so I recommend sizing up! Book 1 is available in paperback and ebook format, as well as the merch from the Kickstarter :).

    

HTBAW Fandom Wiki is up and running! Thanks to Myk Streja and ShitaraRen for tons of help with moderation efforts and everyone else who's done a ton of work on adding information and filling out the Wiki. Thank you everyone for contributing and it's an amazing and super detailed resource!

Feel free to check out my goofy Amazon store if you're so inclined, or even if you don't need anything from my shop, just using this link will earn me a small commission from things you buy on Amazon regardless of what it is (this is an ad, as I get a tiny commission if you do buy something)! Thanks to everyone who's come out to support me through Ko-fi and Patreon!

[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

A reader writes:

I manage a team of 8-12 people at any one time in an entry-level role. Every year, we have a Christmas party at a local hotel and bar. It’s always an open bar — recipe for disaster, but the staff love it.

This year, a member of my team who has a long-term partner, who she talks about regularly, spent the evening kissing a member of another team, out in the open. They were then seen going up to this person’s hotel room at the end of the night, and did not try to hide this.

As her manager, I know my responsibilities and am not letting this impact the way I treat this staff member on a day-to-day basis. I have recent experience of being cheated on myself, so I have found this challenging, but I know how important it is to treat everyone fairly based on their professional contributions.

What’s bothering me is how I feel about her professional judgment following this. Surely someone who would act like this, out in the open, at a work event has questionable judgment at best? Would you let this influence, for example, advancement opportunities where more judgment could be required, or where reputation of the organization becomes more of a factor? We have opportunities to move out of this entry-level role quite regularly, but I now have reservations about passing her on to another department or asking her to represent our department at a more senior level.

Eh, she’s entry-level, so more likely to be young and have less mature judgment.

But let’s back up. First, while the vast majority of the time what people’s sex lives are their own business and should stay out of work considerations, that changes if they bring it into the office. And as a general rule, if someone openly cheats on their partner at a work event, I’m not sure you’re obligated to refuse to let it ever enter your thinking.

However, I’d be more concerned about your employee’s judgment if this were on an ongoing affair being brought into work, versus a one-time error in judgment at a party.

It’s also true that you don’t necessarily know what you saw. For all we know, maybe she wasn’t breaking any rules in her relationship (although it’s still bad judgment to appear to be in front of colleagues). There’s also the impact of alcohol; while no one at a work event should be drinking to the point of sleeping with colleagues they wouldn’t otherwise sleep with, it’s also true that people early in their careers are sometimes still figuring out their limits in that regard. 

Also, what about the other person? Are they anywhere in her chain of command? If so, you’ve got a different and far more pressing issue.

Assuming none of those things are issues, though, then the biggest factor to me is that she’s in an entry-level role. I’d put much more weight on this if she were higher up and in a leadership position. At entry level, the obligations and expectations just aren’t the same, and I would not factor this in when thinking about her advancement unless it’s part of a pattern of bad judgment (in which case it would be the pattern that was the issue, not the party incident on its own).

Last — it’s probably time to reconsider the “recipe for disaster, but the staff love it” open bar.

The post employee openly cheated on her partner at our company party appeared first on Ask a Manager.

[syndicated profile] scalziwhatever_feed

Posted by John Scalzi

Yes, that’s right, the USA Today and Indie Bestseller that was also one of Amazon’s 100 Best Books of 2025, is now out in convenient trade paperback form, with a new bonus chapter: An alternate Day One which I wrote but (previously) did not use. It’s good! And a bit different. And has a cat! Because cats are cool.

Anyway, get it four yourself and buy six more for your friends and family. Saja thanks you in advance for your contribution to his Kibble Fund. It’s available wherever you choose to buy your books, and is of course also still available in ebook and audio.

— JS

[syndicated profile] asknicola_feed

Posted by Nicola Griffith

I’m in the UK—home later this week—but in honour of She Is Here’s book birthday, I’ve changed this website’s avatar to one of the drawings in the book, “Happy Hound.” To see the other drawings—and poems! And essays! And stories!—you will, of course, have to read the book. Which you can! Because it’s out!

The Seattle Times today has a nice feature—part interview, part review—along with a reminder of my first official book event next week at Third Place Books, Ravenna.

Buy! Read! Enjoy!

My *Armed With A Book* Interview

Feb. 10th, 2026 08:00 am
[syndicated profile] floggingbabel_feed

Posted by Michael Swanwick

.



The Universe Box, my newest collection of short fiction from Tachyon Publications is now available for sale! And in an absolute non-coincidence, I've been interviewed on Armed With A Book. (Great title, by the way.)

As a general rule, interviews tend to be either serious ("How does it feel to be a genius?" "Um, good, I guess") or silly ("Give me the names of three ducks." "Um, Huey, Dewey, and Donald"). This was one of the serious ones. But I did my best to be serious and entertaining at the same time. Here, for instance, is part of my answer to the question of what keeps me returning to short fiction:

The novel is a wonderful, shambling, shaggy, and digressive beast that eats what it wants and sleeps where it will. The short story is a predator. It zeroes in on its prey, stalks it, and attacks. The novel is about many things. The short story, only one. But that one is worth every word spent on it.

Which should give you an idea of whether the interview is your sort of thing or not. If it is, you can read it here. Or just go to Armed With A Book at armedwithabook.com and poke around. It's a pretty nifty website.


Above: I stole the "three ducks" witticism from either Michael Kurland's The Unicorn Girl or Chester Anderson's The Butterfly Kid, I forget which. There weren't many hippie science fiction novels, but those were two of the best.

*

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll


Two orphans escape their dismal island home for adventure in a slowly dying world.

Scarlet Morning (Scarlet Morning, volume 1) by ND Stevenson

Duck, politics incoming

Feb. 10th, 2026 05:37 am
firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
[personal profile] firecat
This article boils down to “we told you so.” But I like how it explains why the mainstream media dismissed and downplayed what we told you (because their “how to do journalism” rules demand it, e.g.: “Insist on a both-sides structure even when one side is lying“).

“The Media Malpractice That Sent America Tumbling Into Trumpism” by Parker Molloy
https://newrepublic.com/article/205913/media-malpractice-trumpism-project-2025

Dale Yu: Review of Carnuta

Feb. 10th, 2026 09:49 am
[syndicated profile] opinionatedgamers_feed

Posted by Dale Yu

    Carnuta Designers: Yohan Goh, Hope S. Hwang, Gary Kim  Publisher: Repos Production Players: 2-4 Age: 10+ Time: 25 minutes Played with review copy provided by publisher Welcome to the annual ceremony that brings together druids from distant lands! … Continue reading
[syndicated profile] darths_and_droids_feed

Episode 2738: So Come Up With Me, Run Up, Uh...

Aerial adventures are something that can be used for an interesting change of scenery. Although seldom used, they've always been around. The Dungeons & Dragons Expert Set (1981) had a small section on "Travelling by Air", and the AD&D Dungeon Masters Guide (1979) had three and a half page about "Adventures in the Air", detailing aerial movement, flying mounts, aerial combat, aerial missile fire, and so on.

Most characters will need some sort of assistance to fly through the air - either a flying mount such as a winged horse or a hippogriff, or magic, or technology. But if a party is so equipped, they can cover a ot of ground in the air, encounter aerial monsters or other challenges, and investigate airborne places such as magical castles in the clouds, or cities built on floating islands of rock.

Just be careful not to fall.

aurilee writes:

Commentary by memnarch (who has not seen the movie)

Huh, I never thought Sally would be one to be afraid of heights. I get it though; most people don't normally want to jump out of a perfectly good aircraft. And I even had some trouble psyching myself up for paragliding from a mountain, and that was one where I simply ran forward with the pilot who would be taking care of everything and I simply watched the ground below get further away! Hopefully we've got enough movie left for the skydiving event to happen offscreen to find out what Sally thought about it!

Transcript

February 9, 2026

Feb. 10th, 2026 06:23 am
[syndicated profile] heathercoxrichardson_feed

Posted by Heather Cox Richardson

Last night’s thirteen-minute Super Bowl half-time show featuring Bad Bunny had more watchers than any other halftime show in history: an estimated 135 million watched live, while millions more have streamed it since. Rapper, singer, and record producer Bad Bunny, whose given name is ​​Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio, is from Puerto Rico, and rocketed to prominence with the release of his first hit single on January 25, 2016. On February 1, 2026, just a week before the halftime show, Bad Bunny made history by being the first artist to win Album of the Year at the Grammys for an album recorded in Spanish.

Right-wing critics complained about the NFL’s invitation for Bad Bunny to do the halftime show, saying he was “not an American artist.”

In fact, people born in Puerto Rico are American citizens. But Puerto Rico has an odd relationship with the United States government, a relationship born of the combination of late-nineteenth-century economics and U.S. racism.

In the 1880s, large companies in various industries gobbled up their competitors to create giant “trusts” that monopolized their sector of the economy. The most powerful trust in the United States was the Sugar Trust, officially known as the American Sugar Refining Company, which by 1895 controlled about 95% of the U.S. sugar market. Thanks to pressure from the Sugar Trust, in 1890, Congress passed the McKinley Tariff, which ended sugar tariffs and tried to increase domestic production by offering a bounty on domestic sugar.

This privileged domestic producers, and in 1893, sugar growers in Hawaii staged a coup to overthrow the Hawaiian queen and asked Congress to admit the islands as an American state. President Benjamin Harrison, a friend and confidant of tariff namesake William McKinley, cheerfully backed annexation, but before the treaty could be approved, President Grover Cleveland took office, and with Hawaiians furiously protesting against the machinations of an American business ring, Cleveland insisted on an investigation. Hawaiian statehood stalled. Then an 1894 law reinstated the duties on sugar and ended the bounties.

When the Spanish-American War broke out in 1898, the Senate still did not have enough votes to admit Hawaii, so Congress annexed it by a joint resolution and McKinley, now president, signed the measure. As the popular magazine Harper’s Weekly put it in a cartoon with a little boy dressed in the symbols of the American flag eating candy, America was swallowing “sugar plums.”

The acquisition of the territory of Hawaii had begun the question of annexing islands. Then the 1899 Treaty of Paris that ended the war transferred from the control of Spain to the control of the United States the islands of Cuba, the Philippines, and Puerto Rico, as well as a number of smaller islands including Guam, all of which either were sugar producers or had the potential to become sugar producers.

Since the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, adopted under the Articles of Confederation that made up the basis of the nation’s law before the Constitution, the U.S. had rejected colonies and had instead established a system for incorporating new territories into the country on terms of equality to older states. But in the era of Jim Crow, annexing the newly acquired islands under the terms established a century before presented a political problem for lawmakers. Although sugar growers wanted the islands to be domestic land for purposes of tariffs, most Americans did not want to include the Black and Brown inhabitants of those lands in the United States on terms of equality to white people.

Congress’s 1898 resolution of war against Spain in Cuba had contained the Teller Amendment, which required the U.S. government to support Cuban political independence once the war was over and Spanish troops gone, providing a quick answer to American political annexation of Cuba (although it left room for economic domination). But there was no such amendment for the rest of the islands the U.S. acquired in 1899.

A fiercely pro-business Supreme Court provided a solution for Puerto Rico in what became known as the Insular Cases. In May 1901, in Downes v. Bidwell, the court concluded of the newly acquired island that although “in an international sense [Puerto Rico] was not a foreign country, since it was subject to the sovereignty of and was owned by the United States, it was foreign to the United States in a domestic sense, because the island had not been incorporated into the United States.” This new concept of “unincorporated territories” that were “foreign…in a domestic sense” allowed the U.S. government to legislate over the new lands without having to treat them like other parts of the Union, while also preventing the inclusion of their people in the U.S. body politic.

Two months after the court’s decision, on July 25, McKinley issued a proclamation removing tariff duties for products from Puerto Rico, and the sugar industry boomed.

But what did this system mean for the people in Puerto Rico? In 1902, a pregnant twenty- year-old Puerto Rican woman named Isabel González arrived in New York City to join her fiancé, but the immigration commissioner turned her away on the grounds that she was an “alien” who would require public support. González sued.

When her case reached the Supreme Court, it concluded in the 1904 Gonzalez v. Williams case that González was not an alien, and indeed that she should not have been denied entry to the United States. The justices went on to create a new category of personhood for the island’s inhabitants. They were not aliens, but they were not citizens either. Instead, they were “noncitizen nationals.” As such, they had some constitutional protections but not all. They could travel to the American mainland without being considered immigrants, but they had no voting rights in the U.S.

U.S. citizenship for Puerto Ricans was established in the 1917 Puerto Rico Federal Relations Act, also known as the Jones-Shafroth Act.

Today, Puerto Rico is a self-governing commonwealth of about 3.2 million people. Puerto Ricans do not pay federal taxes or vote in presidential elections, although a resident commissioner serves in Congress and can sit on committees and debate, but not vote on legislation. Puerto Ricans do pay U.S. Social Security taxes and receive certain federal benefits.

Last night, Bad Bunny highlighted Puerto Rican history, beginning with the workers at the heart of colonial sugar production and moving through to those same cane workers hanging from electric poles in an evocation of the recent blackouts in the country’s inadequate electric grid, poorly addressed by the U.S. government after Hurricane Maria wiped out the system in 2017. He carried the flag of the island from before the U.S. takeover—an independence flag banned from 1948 to 1957— its light blue triangle picked up in various fabrics throughout the performance.

He ended by shouting “God Bless America” in English, echoing the United States mantra in an answer to right-wing critics. And then he rejected the idea animating the current U.S. administration’s deportation of Black and Brown people with the claim they are not Americans and their culture will undermine American culture.

After saying “God Bless America, Bad Bunny listed in Spanish: “Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, Brazil, Colombia, Venezuela, Guyana, Panama, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Haiti, Antilles, United States—not Estados Unidos—Canada, and Puerto Rico.”

“Together,” the football he carried said, “we are America.”

Notes:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bad-bunny-super-bowl-halftime-show/

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/08/bad-bunny-super-bowl-trump-maga

https://www.npr.org/2026/02/02/nx-s1-5693043/grammys-2026-bad-bunny-album-of-the-year

https://ls.wisc.edu/news/a-history-of-collaboration

https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/northwest-ordinance

https://www.ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/images/rise-and-decline-of-puertorico_5_17.pdf

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/proclamation-462-cessation-tariff-porto-rico

https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep182/usrep182244/usrep182244.pdf

https://www.politico.com/story/2008/03/puerto-ricans-granted-us-citizenship-march-2-1917-008771

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-latin/bad-bunny-super-bowl-meaning-1235513218/

https://eurweb.com/bad-bunny-halftime/

https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep192/usrep192001/usrep192001.pdf

https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/harp/1217.html

Instagram:

p/DUhWTd1jCjR/

Share

[syndicated profile] daily_illuminator_feed
A YouTube Short by Reuben Levine tells the amazing story of how the Colombian Army hid a message in a pop song via morse code. You can read more about it on Wikipedia, or just see the visualization. Truly, the whole song – "Better Days," by Natalia Gutiérrez and Angelo – is pretty decent.

As an RPG storyteller, I've often had visions about these kind of messages as plot devices, but it's amazing to actually hear how something like that would sound in the real world . . . let alone see it actually used.

Steven Marsh

Warehouse 23 News: Why Is The Darkness Blinking?

They're trapped between the realm of the living and the dead . . . and they're not too pleased about it. The Book of Unlife adds 44 unliving monsters to your The Fantasy Trip campaigns, along with a complete adventure setting. Live like there's too many tomorrows thanks to Warehouse 23!
[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Is stubble unprofessional?

Is having a few days of facial stubble unprofessional? What about showering every other day? How do I know when I’m well-enough groomed?

I’m a cis man who is reasonably adept at social interactions generally but struggles to pick up on unwritten norms/rules (like how often to shave). I got rid of a goatee in college and have generally shaved all my facial hair for every in-person workday since then. I also currently shower every day I go into the office, though I sometimes skip it for WFH days.

I’m considering a change for three reasons: (1) I was reminded of how much of a literally bloody hassle it is when I got to stop shaving for a couple months during parental leave. (2) I’m no longer at a job that has on-site showers for production reasons and safety reasons to shave. (3) I just learned that a lot of men shave every other day rather than daily, and it wasn’t that long ago I heard the argument that daily showers are bad for skin and hair, so I’m beginning to question my previous understanding of grooming rules.

I’d be happy to shave like once or twice a week, as waiting longer between shaves seems to reduce my rate of nicks and irritation. Is it a bad idea to go into the office having showered 2 nights before and shaved 2-4 nights before? My wife knows little about male grooming expectations, so I don’t know who to ask.

Showering: it varies by person. Some people need to shower daily to meet our culture’s expectations around looking and smelling clean enough for work. Some people don’t. Is there a noticeable difference to a bystander between how you look and smell when you showered in the last 24 hours versus when you didn’t? If not, you are someone who can go longer in between showers. If there is, you are not.

Stubble: as long as it looks like an intentional style choice (and not patchy or unkempt), stubble is fine in many, and probably now most, offices. There are still some conservative fields where it’s frowned upon, but they’ve quickly become the exception to the rule. (That said, avoid stubble for an interview, where you’re generally expected to turn up looking more polished.)

2. Should I try to keep an employee who’s leaving because of my predecessor?

I have just joined a small startup as head of engineering. Upon joining, I found out that one of the more experienced engineers has handed in his notice after accepting an offer elsewhere. As this is a team of four, his leaving would be quite impactful.

The reason he gave for leaving is that he wants to be promoted to senior engineer but his old boss wouldn’t do that. In private, he has told me that the previous head was not respecting him and would say things like, “I don’t need to listen to your opinions, you’re not a backend engineer.”

Less than two weeks after I’ve arrived, said employee has come to me and said that he feels my management style is so vastly different from the previous manager’s that he wants to stay; I have given him autonomy and trust which I believe he was previously lacking.

So far, I have said to him that if he proved to me over the next month or two (during his notice period) that he could show the maturity and drive expected of a senior engineer, and show a significant improvement in his soft skills, we could have a conversation about him staying. My concern is that I am encouraging him to leave it quite late to possibly renege on his accepted offer, and that he may end up leaving the company anyway if I don’t immediately promote him.

Should I keep him on this path, giving him the option that we revisit his notice? Or am I lining myself up for trouble down the line? Is there anything else I can or should do?

This is tough because you just joined the team and are still getting the lay of the land.

Normally I’d say that if someone was leaving for a reason that is now moot, and they’re someone who you were sad to see go, you should absolutely be open to letting them stay (assuming you haven’t already hired their replacement). There’s no reason to just oppose that on principle.

But this is messier, since you don’t necessarily have enough info to know how much you should want to keep him — and it sounds like there are some soft skill issues, at a minimum. I would not be leaping to keep someone with soft skill issues.

I’m also not sure it made sense to tell him that if he was able to do XYZ during his notice period, then you could talk about him staying. That’s leaving it very up in the air when you both need to be able to make solid plans (you so you know whether you need to hire a replacement and transition his projects, and him so he knows whether he’s actually taking that other job or not). Plus, is he really going to be able to demonstrate those things in a month or two? Particularly when you’re still new and learning the team?

In your shoes, I’d be seeking insight from others who work with him to try to make a decision now, rather than a month or two from now.

3. Was I wrong to settle with my company rather than continuing on to court?

In my previous role, I was subject to harassment, discrimination, and retaliation for over half a year prior to being terminated. I knew that I had a strong case, had been collecting evidence throughout, and connected with an attorney right away. In the end, I took a settlement. I decided that it would be better for my mental health to stop reliving those experiences. I also worried that a jury trial might be risky in my libertarian state, not to mention the expensive court fees.

I am proud that I stood up for myself while I worked there and after. But since I opted for the settlement, I have also entered into a confidentiality agreement. So while my former coworkers can probably make educated guesses about what happened, the wider world doesn’t know. New hires and new external partners won’t know what kind of company this is. And the bad actors can continue to skirt the laws.

I wonder what can be done, if anything, to help future victims of this company and their discriminatory practices. Was my choice of a settlement too selfish and short-sighted?

No, settling wasn’t selfish or short-sighted. It’s not your responsibility to make this company change, no matter what the personal cost to you might be; it’s the responsibility of the people running the company.

Moreover, even if you hadn’t signed a confidentiality agreement, your ability to hold them accountable would be limited. Yes, you could tell people in your network about how they operate and leave online reviews. But the impact of those things generally won’t outweigh the impact of making them pay financially — which has at least some potential to motivate them to clean up their act so they don’t get hit with future legal bills too. (That doesn’t mean they will! It just has a shot at it.)

4. How to make a conference travel request at a brand new job

I’m in the final stages interviewing for a role that uses a niche tool, and which I’ve been an active member of this tool’s user community for a few years. In recognition of my contributions to this community (knowledge sharing, answering questions on forums, etc.), the company that owns the tool recently sent me a voucher for free admission to their annual conference. The conference is scheduled for three months after the estimated start date of the role I’m interviewing for, and flight/hotel costs are not covered by the voucher.

I would love to attend the conference if possible, but am unsure how and when to approach the subject with my new employer if I end up with the job. The hiring manager had mentioned that some team members have attended in the previous years and I think it could be a great way to get to know the team if others attend as well this year, but I don’t want to press the issue so new in the role. What do you think?

Once you start the job, say this to your new manager fairly early on: “ToolCompany actually sent me a voucher for free admission to the conference since I’ve been an active member of its user community, but it doesn’t include travel. If NewCompany wants to send me, I’d be happy to go if so and could do ___ there.” (Fill in with things beneficial to NewCompany.)

5. Resigning right before or after a stock vest

I have a stock vest scheduled for February 15. I’ve accepted a new job that starts March 2, and I was originally planning to give notice on February 2, with my last day being February 17. That would allow me to give two weeks’ notice and still have a short break before the new role.

However, I’ve seen multiple colleagues in the past give notice and then be walked out or have their resignation accepted immediately, which would have caused them to forfeit unvested equity. I’ve also seen other teams allow their staff to work through the notice period. My specific team hasn’t had any good data either way, though I think I’m on good terms with my manager and team.

Because of that, I’m now considering resigning only after the vest occurs, possibly even the same day or shortly after.

My concern is that this could make my employer upset or feel blindsided, but I also don’t want to put myself at financial risk by giving notice too early. I’m not trying to be deceptive, just careful.

From a professionalism and workplace norms standpoint, is it reasonable to wait until after the vest to resign, even if that means giving little or no notice?

Yes, it is reasonable to wait until after the stock vest; people do that all the time, for this exact reason, and it’s additionally a good idea because you’ve seen that you might not be allowed to work out your notice period. However, ideally you’d find out if the new employer has any flexibility on your start date so that you can still offer two weeks notice; if you explain that leaving earlier will affect you financially, they might be very willing to give you an extra week or two. (People request this all the time, too. They may or may not be able to agree, but it’s not unreasonable to ask.)

The post is stubble unprofessional, should I try to keep an employee who’s leaving, and more appeared first on Ask a Manager.

Another Apple icon regression

Feb. 10th, 2026 04:19 am
[syndicated profile] dr_drang_feed

Posted by Dr. Drang

Apple’s *OS 26 icons have been getting some well-deserved criticism over the past couple of months. There was Jim Nielsen’s complaint about menu icons in macOS. Then came Nikita Prokopov’s more detailed criticism of those same icons.1 And a lot of fun has been poked at Tahoe’s app icons, reaching a peak in heliograph’s deadpan post on Threads.

My long-overdue icon complaint is about a CarPlay icon introduced in the fall of 2024 along with iOS 18. Apart from when an app is taking over the screen, there are two primary screens in CarPlay: the app icon view, which is sort of like the home screen on an iPhone,

CarPlay icon screen example

and the split screen view, which is sort of like the old split view in iPadOS, but with more parts,

CarPlay split screen example

You switch between the two views by tapping the button in the lower left corner of the screen. The button with the 3×3 grid of little squircles is clearly a way to get back to the app icon view. Yes, it used to be a 2×4 grid, which actually matched the icon layout on my screen, but it’s still obvious what the button does. The single hollow squircle, on the other hand, just makes no sense. It doesn’t look anything like the split view screen it takes you to.

This wasn’t the case before the fall of 2024. Here’s what that button used to look like:2

Old CarPlay split screen icon

Kind of obvious where this button takes you, isn’t it?

It’s not that I don’t know what the single hollow squircle button does—I’ve been using it for 16 months. The icon could look like Kurt Vonnegut’s drawing of an asshole in Breakfast of Champions and I’d soon work out what the button was for,3 but the purpose of an icon is to communicate, not just be a placeholder. There’s also parallelism to consider. The icon view button looks like the screen it leads to; so should the split screen view button.

It’s probably impossible to tell the upper echelon of Apple that it’s breaking revenue records in spite of its software design, not because of it. I hope the next regime knows better.


  1. Brent Simmons figured out how to get rid of these abominations, a service to humanity deserving of a Nobel Prize. 

  2. I couldn’t find an image of this button in my Photos library, so I stole it from this TidBITS Talk page

  3. Of course, Apple wouldn’t use an asshole icon—that’s Anthropic’s branding. 

E Pluribus Unum

Feb. 9th, 2026 08:31 pm
rimrunner: (Default)
[personal profile] rimrunner


I hadn’t actually planned to watch the Super Bowl yesterday. I have a friend who I watch it with some years, because his household gets really into it, and that more or less makes up for the fact that I’ve never cared much about football. (I feel like an 80s hipster when I say this, but it’s true.) But then another friend wanted to go out for dinner, and we sort of wound up watching the game because we’re in Seattle and every place with a TV had it tuned to the NFL.

As a non-football fan—even one living in Seattle, where Seahawks excitement was palpable leading up to the big day—the main thing I kept hearing about the game was the halftime show, and how outrageous some people thought it was that the NFL had booked a performer who didn’t even sing in English. To the point that those people decided to do their own show.

Which, sure, okay, why not. It’s not like we’re living in a Clockwork Orange reality where someone’s going to strap you into a chair and pry your eyes open while they stream Youtube at you. You can watch anything you want, including nothing.

The purpose, though, was to make a statement: that’s not American. This is. As outrage marketing goes, I guess it worked, though the Puppy Bowl got more viewers than the All-American Halftime Show.

Bad Bunny, on the other hand, doesn’t need that kind of marketing. Whether you’ve heard of him or not (and I really do not understand “I’ve never heard of X” as a metric as to whether it’s notable, especially for those of us too old to be a marketing demographic for youth culture), the guy is the top-streamed artist on Spotify for 2025.

If anything, the NFL needed him, not the other way around. In 2024, the NFL was quite candid about seeking to grow its audience, specifically among Hispanics. And no wonder: the Super Bowl might top 125 million viewers every year, but the final match of the 2022 FIFA World Cup hit 1.5 billion. American football (as distinct from what the rest of the world calls football) might be a religion for many, but if the NFL has a religion, it’s money.

What’s fascinating to me is how terrifying that is to at least some of the people who decided to spend halftime watching Kid Rock instead. I’m giving a pass to people who genuinely enjoy that lineup better, since in a vast and infinite universe, such people undoubtedly exist. There’s no accounting for taste. The rest, though, seem to feel a need to indicate political affiliation through their choice of entertainment. You can tell who these people are because they criticized this year’s choice on the (inaccurate) grounds that he’s not American, when they raised no such objections about The Who, Paul McCartney, or U2.

There is a shared understanding of the moment going on here, though, and you could see it in Bad Bunny’s show whether or not you understood a word of what he was singing. Visually as well as musically, his performance was crammed full of enough history and symbolism to fuel a raft of thinkpieces, annotations, and reaction videos. Especially if you feel like you missed a lot, go looking for some of those. It’s worth it, in part because among the many things Bad Bunny’s show was about, it was about the shaping of identity and how that happens. It was about the America that I was taught as a child to believe in: the one where we’re unified by our common humanity and belief in self-determination and flourishing for everyone, while honoring the diversity of cultures and histories that brought us all here.

The “All-American Halftime Show” seemed, instead, to be a straitjacket, or a Procrustean bed—something inspired less by possibility and potential, and more by an exclusive and constricted definition of what “American” actually means.

That’s part of this country’s history, too. But if it’s a choice between the two, I’ll go with the one that seeks to welcome instead of exclude.

Profile

jazzfish: Jazz Fish: beret, sunglasses, saxophone (Default)
Tucker McKinnon

Most Popular Tags

Adventures in Mamboland

"Jazz Fish, a saxophone playing wanderer, finds himself in Mamboland at a critical phase in his life." --Howie Green, on his book Jazz Fish Zen

Yeah. That sounds about right.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags