[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My boss doesn’t want to give me a bonus because I’m leaving soon

I am moving soon to another state and leaving my agency to be closer to family. I really don’t want to leave and neither does my boss. He even advocated for me to stay on as fully remote, but his boss and HR said no; the agency has a new strict policy that doesn’t allow employees to be fully remote. I have no choice but to resign.

Coincidentally, my annual performance review is due shortly before the time my lease is up and I have to leave my job. My annual reviews have always come with a bonus, so I’m expecting a lump sum payment that will help cover some of the costs of moving. I’ve been somewhat transparent with my boss about my plans on leaving, but I have not given him an exact resignation date yet because I’m still in the process of finding new employment and coordinating the move so the dates are not yet set in stone.

I have been pushing my boss to get my performance review done so I can feel secure knowing that money is on the way. When I asked him for an update, he was vague and made it seem like he wasn’t sure if it would be approved because his boss and HR know I’m leaving soon. So I asked him if he himself is resistant to giving me a bonus because he knows I’m leaving soon and he said yes because it “doesn’t come off as a good financial decision” to give a chunk of money to an employee who is leaving. I argued that this is my reward for my performance of last year to now, so that money should be paid to me anyway. Plus, I haven’t submitted a resignation letter yet, so technically I’m not leaving until that is made official.

I can say with confidence that I earned a bonus this year and it doesn’t feel fair to be withheld a bonus because I’ll be gone a month or so after it’s paid. I think anyone else in my position would also try to leave with as much as they could. Am I asking for too much or is my timing just bad?

Your timing is bad. It’s very common for companies not to pay bonuses to people who have made it clear they’re leaving soon. You see the bonus as compensation for work you’ve already done, but employers see bonuses as a retention strategy and very often won’t give them if you’ve told them you’re leaving. That’s not always the case; some organizations handle it differently (and for some, the bonus is contractually obligated). But it’s the case enough of the time that it’s an established thing for people to need to delay their exits (and any discussion of their exits) until after a bonus is paid out.

You can certainly make the argument for a bonus as compensation for work already done if you want to — but from what your boss is saying, your company is unlikely to give it to you.

2. When a candidate’s resume has different job titles than LinkedIn does

I’m screening resumes for a role. For anonymity’s sake, let’s say it’s a teapot designer, and we’re looking for five years of designer experience. Many people in designer roles first spend time as teapot painters, and while that experience is valuable, designer is a more expansive, senior role.

On a few occasions now, I’ve looked at resumes that appear strong, with several past designer roles, but when I click through to the applicant’s LinkedIn profile, I see these are actually painter roles, and they’ve changed the titles on their resume. When they’ve done this across the board and have no actual designer experience, I can easily screen them out. But sometimes I’m finding it’s a mix — their current role is in fact a designer role, but previous designer roles were actually painter roles. If they’d been truthful on their application, I would’ve screened them in! But now I feel like I have to screen out these candidates because they’re embellishing their applications.

Am I being too harsh? Is this the red flag I think it is? I feel for applicants in this difficult job market, but I just can’t get past the false titles on the resume, and I’m not sure how I’d explain to my boss that I’m screening in people who don’t have the experience they claim to, even if their actual experience is solid. (Also, these applicants are willingly handing over their LinkedIn links. Do they think we won’t notice the discrepancies between their profile and their application? What am I missing here?)

If they’re people who you otherwise would have advanced, it’s worth doing a phone screen with them to clarify — where you’d ask directly, “I saw your resume calls your current job ’teapot designer’ but on LinkedIn you list it as a ’teapot painter’ role. Which is correct?” Give them a chance to elaborate — because while I can’t speak for what’s common in the teapot industry, there a lot of people have titles that don’t accurately reflect the work they’re doing, and it’s not unheard of for people to try to clarify by using a more accurately descriptive title on their resumes. That might not be what’s happening here; this might just be people trying to finesse their experience into something it isn’t. But it’s worth talking to at least a handful and finding out, to inform your thinking going forward.

If it turns out to be a straight-up lie — they’re just flagrantly misrepresenting their experience to try to get their foot in the door — that’s prohibitive. But if someone says, “I started out doing painting, but for the last two years I’ve been doing the designer job and my company never updated my title,” I wouldn’t hold that against them.

But also, if you’re just doing the initial resume screen before passing resumes on to your boss (and you’re the person doing the phone screens), you should have this conversation with her to get aligned on how to handle it. She may not know you’re seeing this and may have her own opinions about how she wants you to handle it.

3. People misspell my name

I have a fairly straightforward issue that I’m sure you’ve run into as well — my name gets misspelled on emails! I have a fairly common name that has a fairly understandable misspelling (think “Anglea” instead of “Angela”). While this is easy for me to correct internally, how does one go about correcting this for people outside of our organization?

I work in a company where I regularly interact with people from client companies asking for my services, and yes, my name is in my email signature! So far, I’ve been happy to just ignore it and reply to the email content itself, but is there anything you would recommend to “repeat offenders”?

Personally, as someone with a name that frequently gets misspelled (although with mine it’s not a typo, just people thinking I spell Alison with two L’s), I just ignore it. I have decided that life is less stressful when I just don’t care unless it’s someone who’s close to me.

That said, if it bothers you and someone has done it multiple times, it’s fine to just matter-of-factly say at the end of your next reply, “By the way, it’s Angela, not Anglea!” (But expect this still won’t completely solve it.)

4. Should I tell my boss my commute is only doable if we remain hybrid?

I’m a very highly valued executive assistant for a very senior partner in a law firm.

I know eventually my work is going to consider changing our remote work policy to only allow us to work from home one day a week. My commute is 75 minutes each way. It’s a pretty relaxing commute, and I did not mind it at all before I had a baby. However, with a baby it’s only doable because I only have to go in three days a week.

Is it risky to verbalize to my boss and HR that if they ever increased the amount of days in office required, I would have to look for a new job in my own city? I don’t think my job would it be at risk; they’re lost without me and I always have top reviews each year, but am I being naive? My boss isn’t the managing partner at the firm but is very senior and her word has a lot of power. I feel like she should know that one of her most valued employees can only stay because of the current benefits offered with remote work. I really love my job and really love working for my boss I don’t want to leave my job but would absolutely have to if they increased the days in office required.

In your shoes, I’d have a conversation with your boss right now (not with HR) and say something like, “Is your sense that the firm is likely to stick with our current hybrid policy or that they might increase the number of in-office days required at some point? I’m asking because I love my job and I love working for you, but the commute is only doable right now because I only need to do it three days a week.”

Since you’re highly valued, that’s not terrible risky to say. And since she has a lot of capital herself, arm her now with the info she needs if a change ever does start to get discussed. That doesn’t mean they still won’t do it, but at least they won’t be surprised by what it means for you if they do.

5. Employees donating to their own organization in memory of a colleague

My mom worked for a nonprofit for many years. When she passed away, we asked for donations to the nonprofit in her memory. Several of the donations they received were from her colleagues, who still worked for the organization. My sister thinks it’s weird they’d donate to their own employer. I don’t. Who’s right?

I’ve worked at nonprofits where some employees donated simply because they wanted to (truly of their own volition, with no pressure from the organization to do it) and were proud to be donors. So I don’t think it’s weird, particularly since these colleagues were honoring her in the specific way your family requested.

The post boss doesn’t want to give me a bonus because I’m leaving soon, candidate’s resume has different job titles than LinkedIn does, and more appeared first on Ask a Manager.

UI art from 4096

Apr. 28th, 2026 02:32 am
[syndicated profile] unsung_feed

Posted by Marcin Wichary

4096 is a Russian UI artist (I just made up that title) who creates interesting audio-visual mashups. Here are some of the best ones:

Interfaces of rhythm games (like Guitar Hero):

Windows startup sounds, incl. fun hi-def reimagining of their splash screens:

Windows error messages:

If this looks like fun, check out the rest of their work, including Windows 95 mobile and the art of blank VHS tape boxes.

#art #games #windows #youtube

Tactical dark modes

Apr. 28th, 2026 02:03 am
[syndicated profile] unsung_feed

Posted by Marcin Wichary

Before dark mode became mainstream in the late 2010s, there were two main customers of dark UI themes: programming and photo/​video production. But, to the best of my knowledge, they arrived at that preference from two very different angles.

Programmers’ fondness for dark mode was a result of decades of bad display technologies. The early CRTs were so awful, the burn-in risks so real, and the pixels so fuzzy and headache-inducing, that you wanted to see as little screen light up as possible – hence, defaulting to black background for everything computers did.

These challenges were there all the way through the 1980s, really, teaching generations of coders that computers meant light letters on dark backgrounds. Games moved away from being “in space” or “at night” as quickly as they could, text editing and spreadsheets went for paper-like livery soon after that, but programming never meaningfully existed on paper, and so the skeuomorphic pull wasn’t really there.

(Have you ever heard of a term “reverse video”? What’s kind of confusing about it is that its meaning was reversed around that time.)

AV professionals took a different route. They already had CRT calibration, gray walls, and monitor hoods so that light from outside wouldn’t contaminate content colors – and when computer UI started appearing on those CRTs, it was likewise best to keep it as dark and as neutral as possible.

Below are pictures of Avid Composer in 1990, Pixar’s RenderMan in 1995, and the first versions of Lightroom in 2006 where you can see the interface trying to at least gesture toward a dark theme:

Today, things are more flexible. Many people prefer one theme over the other for any of many legitimate reasons, most leave dark theming synced to daylight, and display technology can handle all themes so well that it jumped ahead of our brains, which still have some interesting asymmetries in processing light shapes next to dark ones.

As users celebrated dark mode appearing in popular apps and services in the 2010s, some had to catch up the other way: Apple TV added light mode (for some reason) in 2017, and Affinity apps celebrated new light UI option just earlier this year.

Most programming text editors still default to dark, but allow you to switch; as a software category they were probably the first to fully embrace color theming.

But what led me to writing this post was a delightful discovery today of this setting:

Why, of all apps, would iOS Photos allow you to switch to dark mode, and only while editing to boot?

I think this might be because of the above tradition of pro AV apps, where we learned it’s good for visuals to be surrounded by black; a little nod to its earlier professional roots – similar, perhaps, to the story of the Clear button in calculators.

But I had two more thoughts. First, for all the reasons above, to me at least dark mode still has connotations of “professionalism” and toggling the option makes me feel I’m a bad-ass pro whenever I’m editing a photo. I wonder if others also feel that way, too.

Second, dark mode looks different. Dark UI only when editing means it’s easier to spot whether I’m editing or just browsing, and be ever so slightly better oriented.

(In general, apps today are much more similar-looking, and I’m surprised neither iOS nor Android doesn’t allow you to switch the theme per app, just so it’s easier to know where you are as you move around quickly.)

#colors #details #ios

[syndicated profile] opinionatedgamers_feed

Posted by Matt J Carlson

In 20 Strong Tanglewoods, one takes on the role of their favorite fairytale protagonist in this solo dice-rolling game of adventure. Gamers looking for a card-based, solo, lightweight dungeon crawling experience should check it out. 20 Strong is a series … Continue reading

Rec League

Apr. 28th, 2026 12:48 am
[syndicated profile] daringfireball_feed

Posted by John Gruber

My thanks to Rec League for sponsoring last week at DF. Rec League is a new app/social network for sharing what you’re into. (Get it? The “rec” in “Rec League” is for recommendations. It’s a damn clever name, and sometimes a clever name is half the battle.) It’s really well done, with a great simple brand aesthetic and obvious navigation and mechanics. You can easily use Rec League just to catalog your own collections: restaurants, books, movies, gadgets, whatever. The social aspects are totally low key. You find people whose taste you dig and you follow them. When you see something you like you can favorite or just save it. That’s it. It’s an old-school social network where the point is just fun and surprise and sharing.

Rec League was featured as the “Best New App” in the App Store, and one of their users called it “the only social media I feel better after using”, which feels like a perfect description. It’s just cool people recommending things they think are cool. I’ve already bought some stuff and added some movies to my watch list from using it, and I’ve started a little list of restaurants I recommend in Philadelphia. Download Rec League and check it out. I, uh, recommend it.

[syndicated profile] scalziwhatever_feed

Posted by Athena Scalzi

I heard an absolute banger of an earworm this past week, and have been listening to it nonstop ever since. I want to bestow upon y’all Tame Impala’s new song, “Dracula.”

If you had asked me a week ago if I liked Tame Impala, I would’ve said I was completely indifferent about him and couldn’t even name a song from him. That is still true except for “Dracula.” This song is an absolute home-run of a bop, and there’s even a remix version with JENNIE which is also very good. Here’s both versions for your listening pleasure!

And the JENNIE version:

I have been debating which version I like better, and honestly it’s so hard to decide. I listen to both an equal amount, and both are great. Can’t go wrong with the original, but I love JENNIE’s ethereal voice and the harmonizing with Tame Impala.

My favorite part of the song is how they make “Dracula” rhyme with “spectacular.” Stellar stuff, really.

I hope you enjoy this bop, and that it helps you get movin’ and groovin’ through your next week!

-AMS

Sponsor The Talk Show

Apr. 27th, 2026 11:42 pm
[syndicated profile] daringfireball_feed

Posted by John Gruber

Weekly “sponsor the whole week at DF” spots are sold out until August 24. That’s a great sign that sponsorships here work. But it’s not so great if you have a product or service that you’d like to promote now, or soon, to the DF audience — savvy listeners and readers obsessed with high quality and good design.

The good news on that front is that the sponsorship schedule for The Talk Show has openings, including for the next few episodes, starting this week and into next month. The general rule of thumb is that sponsorship spots on The Talk Show cost one-third the rate for the weekly spots on DF. I’m happy to work out deals a little lower than that for first-time sponsors. If you’ve got a product or service you’d like to hear pitched on America’s favorite three-star podcast, get in touch.

[syndicated profile] kottke_org_feed

Posted by Jason Kottke

Greg Sargent writing for The New Republic:

There’s no clean way to hive off terms like fascism or authoritarianism from Trump’s policies. Even if you disagree that the words apply, their use is backed up by a genuine attempt at intellectual justification for it. The use of these terms just is deeply linked to assessments of Trump’s actual policies, from the lawless renditions to foreign gulags to the unleashing of heavily armed militias in American cities to the naked intimidation of large swaths of civil society.

By contrast, when Trump and MAGA media figures call Democrats “Communists” or “antifa,” all of that is entirely disconnected from any policy realities. Many press figures would like it if there were an Archimedean midpoint between the two parties on all these matters. But there isn’t. At the most basic level, one party continues to function as an actor in a liberal democracy, whereas Trump and much of his movement, with the eager participation of many Republicans, simply do not. Dispensing with harsh but accurate descriptions of his real goals would whitewash them.

See also Republican Extremism and the Myth of “Both Sides” in American Politics.

Tags: Greg Sargent · journalism · politics · usa

Single-issue voters

Apr. 27th, 2026 09:57 pm
[syndicated profile] jwz_org_feed

Posted by jwz

It continues to amaze me that everyone in the Sunset is a single-issue voter, and that issue is wanting to turn a park into a freeway.

District 4 shaping up to be San Francisco's loudest and silliest race:

This level of turmoil befitting a Latin American junta is, again, incongruous for a nice, quiet little beach community. But, again, don't believe it -- this is a place where odd stuff happens. District 4 voters have managed to elect two representatives who later spent time in federal prison -- Leland Yee and Ed Jew. Other than Dan White, who murdered Mayor George Moscone and Supervisor Harvey Milk, the only supes to be incarcerated have been from District 4. And, for what it's worth, both of them went down for on-the-job crimes. [...] In the era of district elections, no D4 supervisor has served two full terms. No district has run through more representatives than District 4. [...]

And yet these are the issues getting the most play in this race: hand-waving about a done-deal zoning plan, calling for the installation of a Great Highway on top of Great Highway and pushing distorted and hyperbolic crime narratives during a time of citywide and nationwide crime reductions. But it gets better: All of this is being undertaken via a tsunami of third-party cash. Vast sums of money are flowing into the sleepy Sunset to further rile everyone up.

Previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously.

[syndicated profile] kottke_org_feed

Posted by Jason Kottke

Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò on magical thinking and elite impunity. “We are ruled by a class of people who seem either to believe or presume that war, disease, and apocalyptic destruction are things that will only ever happen to poorer and browner people.”

[syndicated profile] scalziwhatever_feed

Posted by John Scalzi

Hello to the FBI/Secret Service/NSA people now monitoring this account because apparently the attempted shooter liked a few of my posts in the last month, here's a picture of my cat to get you started

John Scalzi (@scalzi.com) 2026-04-26T18:50:39.094Z

Apparently it’s true: The fellow who came to the Correspondent’s Dinner the other night with a bunch of weapons (and who, it should be noted, came nowhere near the president or anyone else in the ballroom), liked four Bluesky posts of mine in the last month. Which ones? I have no idea, although a cursory view of my last month of Bluesky posts shows nothing particularly spicy in a political sense. This does not surprise me, as I usually send all my really spicy political takes to Threads. Most of the last month of Bluesky posts for me were about JoCo Cruise, whacking on “AI,” photos of cats and Krissy, and talking about writing. Maybe this dude liked cat pictures? He’s arrested now and his Bluesky account is down in any event. We may never know.

My feeling about this is pretty much the same feeling I have about being in the Epstein Files: What the fuck, it’s not great, and also, it doesn’t actually have much to do with me, I’m mostly being sideswiped by this weird damn moment we’re in. I certainly don’t condone attempting to kill the president. Any president, and also, this one in particular. Among other things that would take away the fun of watching him one day rotting in prison along with the rest of his corrupt and horrible family and administration. Keep him alive! For justice!

I’m joking here about being on a federal watch list now, but I should be clear I’m pretty sure I already have an FBI file, and also that this FBI file is really super boring, so anything relating to this will almost certainly be funneled into that. I recently did an FOIA request for my file, so I suppose I will find out soon enough. In the meantime I’ll just have to imagine.

I’ve been informed that some of the folks associated with the Sad Puppies are trying to make hay of my tangential association to this fellow, which, I guess, they would, loud bad logic has always been their MO. My first thought is that when you’re related to an actual successful presidential assassin, a failed one liking your social media posts is weak sauce. My second thought was, huh, the right-wing chudguzzlers are whining about me again, whenever they do that something nice happens with my career, wonder what it will be this time. And indeed, today I got a foreign language offer on one of my books, which I happily accepted. It’s correlation, not causation, to be sure. But it sure does correlate a lot. So keep it up, right-wing chudguzzlers! We’re having our back deck rebuilt, I could use a few more foreign sales. Thanks in advance for your help.

— JS

Crocheted Technology

Apr. 27th, 2026 07:35 pm
[syndicated profile] kottke_org_feed

Posted by Jason Kottke

Nicole Nikolich is a textile artist whose current focus is making crochet artworks that reference old school technology. You can explore her work on her website, at Paradigm Gallery and on Instagram. Some of her artworks are available for sale here.

I’m a sucker for these types of projects because innovations in textile production led to the development of the first computers and the work of artists like Nikolich bring that relationship full circle. See also The Embroidered Computer.

Tags: art · computing · crochet · Nicole Nikolich

Respectful

Apr. 27th, 2026 06:43 pm
[syndicated profile] jwz_org_feed

Posted by jwz

Per my previous email to my HOA's management company regarding the third unannounced multi-hour water shut-off in two weeks, they "kindly ask that all communications remain respectful".

Previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously.

Yours Truly on The Vergecast

Apr. 27th, 2026 06:46 pm
[syndicated profile] daringfireball_feed

Posted by John Gruber

David Pierce:

On this episode of The Vergecast, David and Nilay are joined by Daring Fireball’s John Gruber to talk about their reactions to the news, the (mostly) smooth transition Apple seems to have pulled off, and what we should really make of Tim Cook’s legacy as a product person. Really, the question is: Do we blame Cook for the Touch Bar, or do we blame him for not trying hard enough to make the Touch Bar great?

I know that sounds like a joke but I really do think the biggest problem with the Touch Bar wasn’t that the first crack at it wasn’t good enough, but that they never took a second crack at it. Going back to dumb fiddly F-keys with functional icons printed on them was uncharacteristically lazy for Apple.

[syndicated profile] kottke_org_feed

Posted by Jason Kottke

Presidents Can Be Impeached Because Benjamin Franklin Thought It Was Better Than Assassination. “The Constitution’s impeachment procedures make the removal of the chief magistrate less violent, less disruptive, and less error-prone than assassination.”

[syndicated profile] kottke_org_feed

Posted by Jason Kottke

Thoughtful thread on the armed man who rushed the WHCA dinner. “This guy is indicative of people who are anti Trump not having a voice because Congress and SCOTUS have enabled Trump to obliterate any recourse they have when he does horrible things.”

AI is Making You More Stupider

Apr. 27th, 2026 05:39 pm
[syndicated profile] deusexmachinatio_feed

Posted by Andrea Phillips

This post is part of a series currently in progress. We’re adding links and adjusting titles as we go.

Why AI Sucks and You Shouldn’t Use It

AI is Fundamentally Bad for Most Tasks

AI is Destroying the Planet

AI is Destroying the Economy, Part I

AI is Destroying the Economy, Part II

AI is Morally Bankrupt

AI is Making You More Stupider

That Original Bluesky Thread About Art

All right, let’s make the absolute last-ditch argument against using AI. Let’s say that you don’t care that it’s unreliable vis-a-vis objective reality, and that you think the environmental and economic arguments are too big and systemic for your own use to matter. Let’s say that you’re comfortable with the moral implications for your own use cases.

Putting aside all of that, you still surely care about yourself, and about how use of AI is affecting you, personally.

Maybe you’re using AI to summarize long documents for you, or to help you write or fix code. For translating between human languages. Maybe you’re tweaking things you wrote yourself to sound more friendly, or more assertive. What’s the harm, really?

It turns out there is a harm to the user, and it’s a doozy. Using an LLM is actively making you more stupid than you were to begin with.

Your brain is very much a use-it-or-lose-it kind of deal. This will be obvious to anyone who's learned French in high school and then, after several years, realized they no longer recall anything beyond a handful of basic phrases. The brain is plastic, and it adapts to whatever uses we put it to. Or don’t put it to.

Don't take my word for it. Here's a paper explaining how that works: From tools to threats: a reflection on the impact of artificial-intelligence chatbots on cognitive health

And another: Use of large language models might affect our cognitive skills

Then we get into real-world proof that this is actually happening: The cognitive impacts of large language model interactions on problem solving and decision making using EEG analysis

And another: Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task.

And one more for fun: Cognitive ease at a cost: LLMs reduce mental effort but compromise depth in student scientific inquiry

This isn’t just theory, and it’s not just spitballing based on a couple of online surveys. These are real tests. A few of these researchers have gone as far as doing functional imaging to see what's happening inside the brain — one compared people with no AI use, people who use only search engines, and people who actively use AI chatbots. 

The results show that on a clearly visible, physical level, there are changes happening in your brain structure when you use AI. And they are not good, helpful changes, either. You’re not using it, so you lose it. 

These results were troubling enough to me that I've seriously cut back on looking things up in a search engine the second I can't remember them. What was the name of the actor in that movie? What was even the name of the movie? Now I give it a few hours to see if it surfaces, because I don’t want to be undermining my own capacity to remember any more than I already have.

The brain needs exercise. Memory needs exercise. There was a time I knew the phone numbers of all of my friends and family. There was a time I knew hundreds of characters in Japanese. I don’t anymore. You can probably also name entire categories of things you used to know, but now you don’t.

It isn’t just your memory at stake. Last time we briefly touched on the problem of deskilling in the context of social connections — if you’re using an AI chatbot for companionship, or to mediate your communications with other human beings, you are very literally and very meaningfully impairing your ability to connect with other humans on your own.

But even that isn’t the worst outcome we’re seeing in AI users. 

One of the most common uses of AI right now is some category of ‘research.’ If you are using a chatbot to find information for you, assess it, and reach conclusions on how to use that information, that's work your brain isn't doing.

And what is the core function of our brains in our daily life? It is to gather information, analyze that information, and reach conclusions based on our findings. That is the very basis of your ability to think. The skill that you are losing is the ability to think for yourself.

You are no longer augmenting your own brain; you’re replacing it with something else, something you don’t have any control over. And that's not even taking into account all of those very serious questions about the reliability of that information and those conclusions AI has provided you.

Easy is a Toxin

It doesn’t even take long for the poison to kick in. We lose the taste for thinking on our own shockingly fast. Here’s one more study, just for fun: AI Assistance Reduces Persistence and Hurts Independent Performance

This one shows that if you’re given a task and an AI tool to help you with it, even for only ten minutes, and then that tool is taken away, you’re measurably worse at the task than before — and you’re more likely to just give up. After ten minutes.

So if you're asking the chatbot to write and debug all of your code for you, you’re slowly becoming a worse programmer. If you're asking the chatbot to plan your day and prioritize your tasks, you're not exercising your own executive functioning. If you're using the chatbot as a confidante, you're not exercising the skill of expressing yourself to and connecting with other human beings.

And if you're asking the chatbot to research and summarize things for you, then through lack of practice, you are slowly killing your own ability to take in and process information for yourself. Planning, prioritizing, weighing, all of it.

When you’re venturing into new-to-you areas of knowledge, it might still feel like you’re learning something, but it’s a guarantee that you're coming away with a more shallow understanding of the material than if you'd actually done the reading. The symbol is not the signified. Reading War and Peace can't be replaced by reading the Spark Notes. And your own takeaways might have been very, very different.

It's a great irony that one of the most hyped uses of AI right now is in education, with an eye to replacing human teachers and professors, when this known impact means AI is fundamentally unsuitable for any educational context.

This isn’t the first technology to undermine our own natural capacities and systems. Socrates famously complained that the technology of writing eroded the memory. We can’t walk as far since we invented cars. We still haven’t even fully reckoned with the social and physical changes caused by a seemingly old technology: artificial light and the dramatic way it’s changed sleep.

Our first impulse is almost always to choose ease over effort. And lo these past two hundred years, we’ve made our lives very easy, indeed. We’re killing ourselves with comfort.

But. At a certain point, if you’re using technology to reduce every friction point in your life to nothing, if you’re trying to create a smooth and effortless slide for yourself from the cradle to the grave, than I have to ask you: what are you even here for? What is the point of your life, anyway?

Is it to just collect positive sensory experiences? Then you might as well be a sea sponge. Or do you want something purposeful, do you want a life with meaning? Do you want to connect with other human beings? Do you want to learn and grow? Do you want to make and build ideas, art, communities, businesses?

All of that takes work. Your work.

Profile

jazzfish: Jazz Fish: beret, sunglasses, saxophone (Default)
Tucker McKinnon

Most Popular Tags

Adventures in Mamboland

"Jazz Fish, a saxophone playing wanderer, finds himself in Mamboland at a critical phase in his life." --Howie Green, on his book Jazz Fish Zen

Yeah. That sounds about right.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags