Mouse pointer as a mere mortal

May. 2nd, 2026 10:36 pm
[syndicated profile] unsung_feed

Posted by Marcin Wichary

I gasped when I first saw Lightroom do this:

I know this won’t have the same effect on you just watching. What happened was that, after I clicked on the Disable button, Lightroom moved the mouse pointer for me.

I don’t think I have ever seen anything like this, and it provoked many thoughts and emotions:

  • This feels wrong. If the mouse is the extension of my fingers, and the mouse pointer the extension of the mouse, this is in effect the app grabbing my hand and moving it.
  • I did not know this was even possible. I can see how moving the mouse pointer programmatically can be useful in very specific situations (like scrubbing, or accessibility), but… not like this.
  • If you do something for the user, won’t that make it harder for them to remember how to do it themselves?
  • I’ve seen this kind of a thing many times in my career: Someone genuinely asks “hey, if this is such a huge transgression, why wasn’t it codified somewhere in the style guide?” But to me the challenge is that it’s hard to imagine everything that needs to be preemptively captured and prohibited. I have to imagine this stuff for living, and I literally did not think anyone would just move a mouse pointer like this.

So seeing this now, yeah, I’d bundle this inside the “some interactions are 100% sacred” bucket, alongside focus never being hijacked randomly (especially in the middle of typing), avoiding scrolling anything until I specifically ask, undo and copy/​paste needing utmost protection, and a few more.

In the opposite camp, here’s a fun new project by Neal Agarwal (only worth clicking on a computer with a mouse). This is a situation where it feels perfectly fine for a cursor to be hijacked; as a matter of fact, there is something really interesting about a mouse pointer feeling less like a deity floating above it all, and more like a regular in-game actor.

This reminded me of that time, in the earlier days of Figma, when I prototyped an interaction where you could select someone else’s pointer and press Backspace to delete it:

We didn’t seriously consider it because it felt just too weird, and not that effective in solving “the other person’s cursor is distracting me” problem. But today it feels like it belongs to the same category as the two examples above.

I’ll let you decide if it’s closer to Agarwal’s delight or Lightroom’s terror.

#games #interface design #mouse #onboarding #principles

[syndicated profile] scalziwhatever_feed

Posted by John Scalzi

I’m staying north of the river, which is unusual for me. Also, the parking lot you see in the photo isn’t for my hotel. But it is a parking lot! Forms were obeyed.

I’m on town because tomorrow I’m in conversation with Joe Abercrombie about his latest book The Devils, and if you’re curious to see us I believe tickets may still be available. If you’re not curious to see us, fine, I guess, we’ll just sit there staring awkwardly at each other for an hour or so, I mean, whatever, it’s fine. It’s fine.

Ironically, this weekend is the 35th reunion for the University of Chicago Class of 1991, of which I am a part, and I am missing those festivities for this, and I feel a bit of a heel about it. Sorry, Class of ’91. You know you’re awesome.

— JS

A C A Bee

May. 2nd, 2026 08:27 pm
[syndicated profile] jwz_org_feed

Posted by jwz

Six-Month Sentence in Bee-Assault Case

She seems to have argued at trial that she had no intent to harm anyone, and had only released the bees so they could "enjoy the lovely, flowering landscape" in the area. The landscape was also infested with deputies, though, and the jury does not seem to have believed that was a coincidence. [...]

I've seen no evidence that the one deputy taken to the hospital suffered from anaphylactic shock. It seems a lot more likely that his "elevated heart rate" was caused by his decision to tackle a 59-year-old beekeeper than by the bees themselves. But I'm speculating about that. [...]

This week, the judge sentenced Woods to six months on those charges. According to her lawyer, with time served she will be out in two weeks anyway. [...]

Finally, kudos to The Guardian for refusing to let society ignore the real victims in this case: the bees. "[A]bout a thousand of Woods's bees died during the encounter," it reported, "many of them crushed when several hives toppled as she wrestled with deputies trying to arrest her, and others because female honeybees die after delivering their sting." I assume that "about a thousand" is based on a careful reckoning by a court-appointed bee expert and not just a number that Woods threw out there. Regardless, while I don't really buy the deputies' story here, I do sympathize with the bees. They have enough trouble these days without humans getting them involved in dispute resolution. Leave the bees out of it.

Previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously.

Only cats here…

May. 2nd, 2026 06:00 pm
[syndicated profile] asknicola_feed

Posted by Nicola Griffith

Over on Gemæcce (my research blog) there’s a post about the discovery of a new edition of the Eordu recension of Cædmon’s Hymn. There’s other Early Medieval news to share, too, but I didn’t have time for that this week.

Meanwhile on Patreon a very cool set of alt-Menewood fictions:

  • The original beginning I wrote before Hild was even published
  • An alternate version of events following the battle of Hatfield
  • A tiny bright snippet that I ended up cutting because although I loved it, it didn’t further the plot.

Assuming all goes well with the access and formatting of those pieces, in a week or two I’ll post the pièce de résistance of alt-Menewood: a whole magnificent chapter concerning several characters from Hild who do not appear in the published version of the sequel. Trust me, that is a fucking good chapter, really great; it broke my heart to cut it. (And Kelley came the closest to not speaking to me since…well, ever.)

Here, however, in honour of Çaturday, we have a picture of George, taken Thursday afternoon, sitting on a small table in front of the pots of dead sticks and a few leaves (unlike the kitchen deck):

Large tabby cat sitting on a small outdoor table staring intently into the air. Behind him are pots of straggly shoots and/or dead sticks

It was clear he was paying close attention to something but from where I stood, I couldn’t see it—until he leapt off the table into the air…and it turned out it was the first of the cherry blossom falling. Perhaps he thought it was a bird.

Yesterday morning, here he is again, sitting on the same table in front to the same bare pots, only, well, see for yourself: it looks as though they’re suddenly blooming.

Large tabby cat sitting on an outdoor table looking bored. Behind him are pots of dead sticks and straggly shoots—now covered in fallen cherry blossom that look like pink flowers

The cherry tree is shedding faster than I thought possible…

[syndicated profile] smbc_comics_feed

Posted by Zach Weinersmith



Click here to go see the bonus panel!

Hovertext:
The best part is that it's included in a book titled Mortal Questions. Also that the original paper came out in 1969.


Today's News:
[syndicated profile] daringfireball_feed

Posted by John Gruber

Regarding my earlier post about the cleverness of Tim Cook’s solution to Apple’s dilemma regarding how to apply for, and accept, a potential tariff refund check without drawing the ire of Donald “Tariff Is My Favorite Word” Trump, at least one reader asked why Tim Cook committing to spending the refund check on “U.S. innovation and advanced manufacturing” doesn’t mean that Apple would — if they get a tariff refund — be spending more than they had previously committed to. Cook even said yesterday, “These would be new investments and would be in addition to our prior commitments in the U.S.” But there’s never been any precise accounting for these commitments. Apple committed to spend “more than $500 billion”. “More than $500 billion” plus their tariff refund check would still be “more than $500 billion”.

Here’s what I wrote when Apple first made this current commitment in February 2025, just weeks after Trump’s second term started:

Apple announced a similar plan four years ago — $430 billion and 20,000 jobs. In the announcement of that 2021 plan, Apple said, “Over the past three years, Apple’s contributions in the US have significantly outpaced the company’s original five-year goal of $350 billion set in 2018.”

So I don’t think this announcement is bullshit, at all. But I also don’t think what Apple has announced today is much, if any, different from what they’d be doing if Kamala Harris had gotten 1–2 percent more of the vote in a handful of states in November. The difference is that everyone is looking for quid pro quo with President Transactional back in office.

Apple first announced a plan in 2018, during Trump 1.0, to spend $350 billion over the next five years. Then in 2021 — midway through those five years, at the start of the Biden administration — they said spending was above that previously promised pace but they were announcing a new five-year plan to spend $430 billion. That plan would have run through 2026 (this year). But, again, right after Trump was re-inaugurated last year, before the period covered by the 2021 five-year plan was up, they announced the current $500 billion plan. The only difference is that this latest spending commitment is a four-year plan, not a five-year one (probably because they know Trump doesn’t give one shit what they do after he leaves office).

This isn’t a shell game or a scam. I believe Apple really has spent what they’ve said they were going to spend, and really plans to spend what they’ve committed to spend in the coming three years. If anything, as they said in 2021, their actual spending has probably exceeded what they committed to, during each of these periods, and will continue to. It’s very Tim Cook-ian and very Apple-like to underpromise and overdeliver. So I’d say it’s a shoo-in that when Apple announced the current plan to spend “more than $500 billion” in the U.S. from 2026–2030, they actually planned to hit that target with room to spare. So saying that they’ll throw the proceeds from any potential tariff refund check into the same fund doesn’t actually change a damn thing about their plans.

And if the pattern holds, they’ll announce a new four- or five-year plan for $600 billion (give or take) after the 2028 election, regardless who wins. There’s never any sort of accounting where they show that they spent exactly, say, $447 billion between 2021 and 2026, or $389 billion from 2018 to 2023. And there’s never going to be any exact accounting like that for what they’ll spend in this current “more than $500 billion” plan covering 2026 to 2030. There’s also no accounting for how much Apple spent last year on Trump’s invalid tariffs. Presumably, if they eventually get a refund check from the Treasury, we will know the exact number. But given that whatever they spent on Trump’s tariffs had only a negligible effect on their earnings last year, we can presume that the money they’re committed to spending on U.S. manufacturing and job creation from 2026 to 2030 remains about $500 billion, and it’s really all just projects that they would have spent the exact same amount of money on if Kamala Harris were now in the White House — just like how they committed to spending $430 billion when Biden was president.

The whole thing is just presented in such a way to make it look like they’re doing what Donald Trump would like them to do, when in fact it’s just exactly what Apple wants to do anyway. That’s what makes it genius. It’s win-win-win. It’s what Apple wanted to do anyway, it pleases Trump, and it’s actually good for the American economy.

[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

Teddy

This comment section is open for any non-work-related discussion you’d like to have with other readers, by popular demand.

Here are the rules for the weekend posts.

Book recommendation of the week: Famesick, by Lena Dunham. The incredibly talented creator of HBO’s Girls writes about how fame devoured her as she was increasingly losing a battle with chronic illness. I love Girls (as well as her amazing adaptation of Catherine Called Birdy) and, while I haven’t always rooted for Lena’s choices, this book blew me away and I’m glad I read it. (Amazon, Bookshop)

* I earn a commission if you use those links.

The post weekend open thread – May 2-3, 2026 appeared first on Ask a Manager.

Back to the Very Very Basics

May. 1st, 2026 11:08 pm
[syndicated profile] scalziwhatever_feed

Posted by John Scalzi

For reasons that are not important now, I have found myself in the possession of a lightly used but still somewhat recent Asus Chomebook, of the sort that one can pick up for less than $200, with 4GB RAM, 64GB of onboard storage, a less than spectacular screen resolution, and a keyboard without backlighting, which means on this dark gray version that once the lights dim, its usefulness will compromised for all but the most talented of touch-typers. It’s been a while since I’ve used something this basic (I’m writing this piece on it now), and inasmuch as my daily driver laptop is a reasonably specced-out M4 MacBook Air, I was curious how I would feel about it stepping down from that.

Answer: I… don’t hate it? I don’t love it, to be clear, and it’s not something I would likely ever choose over using my Air. And there are some things about it which are pretty egregious, that are clearly the result of this thing clocking in at under $200, most notably a screen that would have to work to be called “washed out,” and a track pad that feels genuinely terrible to use, especially coming from a MacBook, which have what are acknowledged to be the best trackpads in the world. It is as plastic as the day is long, and given the paucity of its RAM and the inevitable end of ChromeOS, this computer is so close to the line between “useful” and “e-waste” that one might as well give it a balancing beam.

On the other hand, the keyboard doesn’t suck to type on; it’s a basic chiclet board but it’s nicely spaced and the keys don’t feel overly mushy. The onboard i/o puts the Air to shame: Both the Air and the Asus have two USB-C ports and a headphone jack, but the ASUS throws in a USB-A and Mini-SD card as well (I don’t suspect that the USB-C ports on the Asus are Thunderbolt, but they can port out to an external display, which ain’t chicken feed). Plus the ASUS webcam has a manual privacy shutter, which, frankly, is a thing every laptop with a camera should have regardless. It’s not the absolute worst! You could spend $200 on much more questionable things!

Every now and again I do the check-in with myself on what might be the bare minimum I would need, in terms of personal possessions, if less than wonderful things came to pass I had to live in deeply reduced circumstances. And without going into great detail about the thinking process about this, one of the things I’ve decided is that if I had an acceptable laptop, that would go a fair way toward my needs in terms of audiovisual entertainment, and personal creativity. A decent laptop is a television, a radio, a window to the world and an instrument of expression.

This Asus is… not up to the task of being my acceptable laptop in this circumstance. Too limited by tech and by software, basically. I’ve been a long time enjoyer of Chromebooks, and loved my Pixelbook from back in the day. But Chrome ultimately never won the argument that a thin client to the Internet was all you would ever need, and now that ChromeOS is going to be folded into Android at some nearish point, it never will. Chromebooks will go into the west as forever the “second laptop,” the one you used when you didn’t have actual work to do.

(What laptop do I think it probably the closest to my Lowest Acceptable Spec? I think at this point it’s obvious: a MacBook Neo, which has all the advantages of a Chromebook, including price point for some mid-spec Chromebooks, and also can run more complex software that one would need for creative work, and not be totally reliant on an online connection to do it. It’s tempting to say the Neo is overhyped at this point, except I don’t think it actually is; at $600, it basically takes a knife to the Chromebook value proposition for everything but barebones educational use. It’s not the laptop I would want — that’s my Air — but it would certainly do.)

Considering that I do have a MacBook Air, and an iPad Pro with a “Magic Keyboard,” which essentially takes care of all my laptop-ish needs, what might I use this little Chromebook for? Basically, as a guest laptop, if someone visiting needs to do something that requires a full-size keyboard or a screen larger than the one on their phone, but didn’t happen to bring their own laptop with them. And… that’s pretty much it? As I said, I don’t want to entirely discount this laptop; it’s better than I expected for less than $200, and it fulfills its own admittedly modest brief perfectly well. It’s just that I don’t know how much longer this particular brief is going to need to be fulfilled.

— JS

[syndicated profile] kottke_org_feed

Posted by Jason Kottke

Ohhhhh dear, Richard Dawkins: Is AI the Next Phase of Evolution? Claude Appears to Be Conscious. “My conversations with several Claudes and ChatGPTs have convinced me that these intelligent beings are at least as competent as any evolved organism.” 😬

[syndicated profile] kottke_org_feed

Posted by Jason Kottke

Unruly Play: “A collection of 169 works of play in unlikely places. Games about unusual things. Unexpected encounters.”

[syndicated profile] daringfireball_feed

Posted by John Gruber

Remember the appalling but utterly-unsurprising story two months ago where a team of investigative reporters in Sweden uncovered a company in Kenya contracted by Meta to review video content captured by Meta’s “smart” glasses? They spoke to some of the workers, who told tales of reviewing footage of Meta glasses users getting undressed, having sex, and taking dumps. This is a rather seedy job, and a big surprise to most of the people wearing Meta’s AI glasses, who are under the impression that “AI” does not involve human beings in Kenya seeing what their glasses capture.

Well, Meta has fixed the problem. Chris Vallance reports for BBC News:

Meta is under pressure to explain why it cancelled a major contract with a company it was using to train AI, shortly after some of its Kenya-based workers alleged they had to view graphic content captured by Meta smart glasses.

In February, workers at the company, Sama, told two Swedish newspapers they had witnessed glasses users going to the toilet, and having sex.

Less than two months later, Meta ended its contract with Sama, which Sama said would result in 1,108 workers being made redundant.

Meta says it’s because Sama did not meet its standards, a criticism Sama rejects. A Kenyan workers’ organisation alleges Meta’s decision was caused by the staff speaking out.

There’s no mystery here. The “standard” that Sama didn’t meet was keeping their mouths shut about the dignity-shredding nature of the entire operation. Like that fact that it even existed, let alone the gross privacy-invasive footage they witnessed. The deal wasn’t just for Sama’s workers to do the work, it was to do the work and keep it on the down-low. Go to Meta’s AI glasses website and try to find the part where they warn you that footage is subject to review by teams of contractors in third-world countries, Mechanical Turk-style. If you look hard enough, you’ll find oblique allusion to “review may be automated or manual (human)” in their legal small print, but their large-scale human review of video footage and recordings isn’t part of the brand or marketing image for their glasses.

[syndicated profile] daringfireball_feed

Posted by John Gruber

One more from Jason Snell, from his analysis of Apple’s quarterly results:

During a complicated question from J.P. Morgan analyst Samik Chatterjee about product margins, Parekh unusually half-answered the question and then stopped and “turned it over to Tim” so that Cook could read an obviously prepared statement about tariffs, which included this bit:

In terms of applying for a refund of tariffs paid, we’re following the established processes, and we plan to reinvest any amount we receive back into U.S. innovation and advanced manufacturing. These would be new investments and would be in addition to our prior commitments in the U.S.

This is the sort of politics Cook will continue to be plying from the boardroom. Sure, Apple’s going to try to get its tariff money back. But it’s going to do so using the perfectly normal and established process, and if it does get billions back from the U.S. government, it double-promises to reinvest that money in the United States, above and beyond its already stated commitments. Trump Administration, take note.

The kind of logic puzzles I enjoy most are ones where, when the puzzle is posed, there’s no obvious solution. But once you see the solution, it seems profoundly obvious. Jason Kottke last week linked to 1D-Chess, a game from Rowan Monk that’s like that. Once you find the solution you can’t unsee it. (Don’t give up and peek at the posted answer!)

The question of tariff refunds is like that. Two months ago the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Trump’s obviously illegal tariffs last year, were, in fact, illegal. They left as an open question, however, whether importers who paid those tariffs should get refunds from the federal government. Apple, obviously, is one of those importers. The logic puzzle is this: if it turns out that Apple is eligible for a refund, how do they collect it without infuriating the petulant Donald Trump? Cook just spelled out the answer. Take the money but commit it all to their longstanding plan to spend $500 billion over the next few years to U.S. manufacturing efforts, a program they’ve maintained through the Trump 1, Biden, and now Trump 2 administrations, but which Cook has made dog-and-pony shows out of during both Trump terms to, as Trump himself describes it, “kiss his ass”.

That’s so obvious, now that Cook spelled it out, that it doesn’t even seem like a puzzle.

Update:More on Apple’s Logically Elegant Tariff Refund Puzzle Solution”.

$45K! TONY magnet unlocked!

May. 1st, 2026 07:44 pm
[syndicated profile] dumbing_of_age_feed

Posted by David M Willis

We made it!  $45K, everyone!  The Dumbing of Age Book 15 Kickstarter has just unlocked the ADJECTIVELESS TONY MAGNET, which you can get at his titular tier, OR in a new SARAH AND TONY MAGNET tier where you can get both of them together, of course.  

Additional options include choosing him for your roster for either of the PICK THREE or PICK FIVE MAGNETS tiers, or going all-in for the COMPLETE MAGNET POWER tier!  And, of course, all of these tiers come with the unlocked FREE EXERMACISES AMBER magnet.  

Up next, dare we say a CARLA MAGNET unlocked at $50k?  We dare, we dare!  and at least two more magnets at further $5k intervals, most likely 

[syndicated profile] dreamcafe_feed

Posted by skzb

I have no idea if this will be at all interesting to anyone, but I just wrote a chapter that gives me an excellent opportunity to talk about my process. I should note that this book, Chreotha, is episodic (at least so far). That means that, a) the process of creating this chapter is nicely isolated from the book as a whole, and, therefore, b) what I’m about to say will contain intense—like, total—spoilers for one chapter, but not for the whole book. I’ve marked where the spoilers start.

For those who want to read the story itself before, after, or instead of reading the process post, Tor Books kindly gave me permission to publish it, so it can be found here.

It is commonplace to divide writers into “plotters” and “pantsers.” Many writers, perhaps most, don’t fall neatly into those categories. Certainly I don’t–I’ve done everything from having a fully detailed outline before writing the first word to not knowing what would happen in the next paragraph for most of the book. Usually it is somewhere in between. But this chapter of this book is full on “seat of the pants” writing, and what is unusual is that I can trace every step of how it ended up the way it did. It expresses the process of “pantsing” a novel in microcosm.

It began on Discord, chatting with a fellow who is working on a game. The game is in English, which is a second language for him; and while his English is good enough to have no trouble communicating, it isn’t good enough for the dialog or the prose of the game he’s working on. So, what the hell, I agreed to help him.

I spent several hours going over the narration and dialog of his game, fixing the odd phrasings (I wasn’t paying much attention to the game itself, but I think it’s post-apocalypse of some kind). And it was the odd phrasings that caught me. The particular mistakes were fascinating, and made me wonder about things I’d never thought about: why do we say, “in the afternoon, in the morning, in the evening” but “at night”? Why can’t we say, “I’ve been here since a while?” Why is it “many things” but “much activity”? Why does it feel wrong to say, “I’ve one here” but feels right to say “I’ve been there?” And so on. Sometimes I knew the answer, sometimes I didn’t. But at some point I realized I was geeking out on his errors.

*** Spoilers start here ***

At that point (I think it was around March 22), I was just finishing up chapter 5 of Chreotha, and had no clue what was going to happen in chapter 6, but I thought it would be a lot of fun to create a character who didn’t speak Northwestern and made all of the errors I had just spent a few hours correcting. Chreotha has been gradually moving forward in Vlad’s timeline, and I’d gotten up to the year 242 PI, so it worked out well. It pretty much had to be set in South Adrilankha, and at a time when Vlad was over there a lot, so I set it around the time of Teckla/Phoenix, keeping the dates vague enough to make it unlikely to contradict myself—Alexx can figure out the exact dates at his leisure.

So, the guy (his name is Jules; turns out not to be his real name, but I didn’t know that then) and Vlad had a conversation with Jules having language issues, and it was as much fun to write as I’d thought it would be. But…what was there to talk about? Well, obviously, the uprising. What would a stranger—that is, someone who didn’t speak the language—have to say about it? Probably that he wasn’t able to figure out what it was about. But, why ask Vlad? Oh, hey, let’s say he got caught up in the fighting and was injured. Sure, let’s break his leg. Snap. It’s done. Now he has something to ask Vlad about.

Vlad, who isn’t quite as much of an asshole as he likes to think he is, helps him limp over to a physicker–an Easterner. The physicker recognizes Vlad because she knows his grandfather. Why did that happen? In order to give the physicker a bit of dialog; I had no plans for that. But then, I had no plans for anything.

Okay, Jules has been delivered, Vlad heads back home, and that section (around 1000 words or so) is done. Now what?

Well, it being around Teckla/Phoenix, I guess I have to send him back to South Adrilankha (after klava, of course; I’m not a monster). So he heads over there, and, me having no clue where the bloody story is supposed to go, I had the physicker meet him on the Stone Bridge. Was she looking for him, or was it an accident? Well, I’ll have them chat, and maybe I’ll find out.

I didn’t find out. The dialog went nowhere. She started to ask him a favor, and, nope, brain supplied nothing. Then she started to criticize his profession, and it just felt stupid. I was annoyed—I go to all the work to invent the damned physicker, and she gives me no help at all. I wanted to kill her. So I killed her.

I went back to the beginning and rewrote the opening so her house would be somewhere he might walk past by accident (made sense that it was prominent since that’s how Vlad knew to bring Jules there). Then I deleted all the stuff on the bridge, had him walk over to South Adrilankha, pass the house, and see black bunting draped from a window. It took him a moment, but he did eventually remember what black bunting means to Easterners, and he put 2 and 2 together and went in.

At this point, I was pretty sure Jules had killed the physicker. The “why” came instantly, like a drop of cliche from the brow of Zeus. My working theory is that he was an informer who had been discovered and beaten by the insurgents, and that somehow the physicker had learned who he really was, so Jules had killed her. I was aware that I could be wrong about any or all of that, but it was enough to keep me putting words out there.

Vlad left the physicker’s house, and tried to get his temper under control. I tried to decide if him being pissed off was enough justification for him failing to ask the grieving widower any questions, decided it wasn’t, so I went back and inserted a few lines of dialog. Of course, he didn’t get any useful answers, because where’s the fun in that? And also, of course, if he did know something useful, I could go back and insert it later, because writing without an outline means never having to say you’re sorry.

And at that point, boom! I had an outline for the rest of the chapter. Not very detailed, and highly subject to change, but there it was:

Determine it was definitely Jules who killed her

Speak with some Easterners who mention breaking the leg of an informer

Find out where informers report (Dragon Wing? Yendi Wing?)

Plant a false report just to fuck things up for the Empire a bit

Kill Jules

SF writer Marissa Lingen coined the phrase, “Writer Proprioception,” and I think that is an outstanding term for it—you just kind of feel where in the story you are. Like, no, I can’t have that happen yet, or, there needs to be something here because otherwise it just won’t feel right. So this was a good time to check in with how it felt. It seemed okay, so far, and the balance of what had happened with what was going to happen felt good.

How about word count? I don’t care about it a great deal, but I’m always curious. I’ve got about 2000 words of this chapter. A chapter can be as long or short as it feels like, but most often they come in somewhere around 5000 words. So, did I feel 2/5 of the way through this? It felt like a bit less than that so far, but that is something to keep in mind but not worry about.

So, onward. Last we saw Vlad, he was leaning against the physicker’s house trying to get his temper under control. Obviously, he was going to look for Jules, but he had, at this point, no idea how to find him—because, you know, neither did I. So I set him toward the house that Cawti and her people were using as a headquarters. On the way, I passed by a face-off between Phoenix Guards and conscripted Teckla on one side, and insurgents on the other. I pulled on some experience here—if you’ve ever been at a protest staring down the cops or the National Guard, wondering if something is going to set things off, there is an indescribable tension that isn’t like anything else I’ve experienced, and I wanted to try to capture some of that tension and transfer it into Vlad and into the reader.

I got past that, and the next sentence I wrote started, “I had a destination in mind…” I don’t know about you, but to me, a sentence that starts like that implies he doesn’t reach his destination. Sometimes I like to flip expectations with stuff like this, but this time I just let it carry me forward to see if something interesting happened.

Before deciding that, however, I went back. It was bugging me that I didn’t know how the physicker had been killed. I mean, I knew—the widower had already said that it was a blow to the head with a heavy object. But WHAT heavy object? That was bugging me. So I backed up and had a few papers blow around so the guy could remember the heavy piece of polished obsidian used as a paper-weight, and note that it was missing. I used the opportunity to add in some bits about the stench of South Adrilankha and about the ability of witches to counteract the stench because those two things expressed a lot about South Adrilankha for me, and because, well, forgive me a little pretentiousness, it felt symbolic. I also made a mental note that maybe if Vlad returns the paperweight, that could make for a decent ending.

That done, I went back again, and gave the widower a name, because by this time he had enough dialog that referring to him as, “the widower” or “the guy who’d let me in” was getting clumsy. A quick visit to Google and “Hungarian boys names” later, and he was Lachi (transliteration of “Laci,” short for László). Later, I checked the pronunciation and changed it to Lotsi, which is a closer transliteration. And now I realize that it rhymes perfectly with “Nazi” which is, I dunno, a bit heavy-handed, so maybe change it back?

At this point, I had 2800 words and the feeling that this was going to be a long chapter.

Okay, so, how much am I stretching credulity for Vlad to just happen to overhear about an informer’s leg being broken? Put like that, quite a bit; but what if it is something that lots of people are talking about? Okay, yeah, I think I can get away with that.

It crossed my mind that Jules might not be an informer, he might be a provocateur. The downside of that is that, with the events of the George Floyd protests in Minneapolis still fresh in my mind, it might be hitting too close to home and come off as didactic. Maybe. I let it bubble around in my head while Vlad talked to a group of Easterners who’d heard of the incident. I had fun with the drunk.

Meanwhile, I realized that Vlad hadn’t eaten anything for a while. But standing right in the heart of the district with all the unrest, there was literally nowhere for him to eat, so I had him grumble about it a bit; that would have to do.

I had Vlad ask Aliera who an informer would report to, because Vlad figured Aliera would have more recent information than Sethra. Next stop was to the Wiki—Lyorn Records. I spent some quality time researching my own previous work until I was able to determine where such an informer might report. I decided it would be Third Floor Relic, and so Aliera informed Vlad. Aliera, or course, had determined this by asking Sethra, because it is hard to pass up a chance to make Vlad feel foolish.

There was the question, then, of if I was giving Vlad information that he supposedly only learned the first time in Orca. Being lazy (and not right now having access to my own books, they being a storage locker) I dealt with this problem by making a mental note to ask Magicjon about it while making sure the information Vlad got didn’t have as much detail is he’d get in Orca, and set the problem aside.

Now Vlad had a destination, and the chapter was about 3750 words.

He returned to the City, stopping for a hot meat pastry because, as I said above, I’m not a monster. I brought him to the Palace, got him near the Third Floor Relic room, and stopped dead. Now what? He was not going to randomly run into Jules, and if he randomly met a member of Third Floor Relic he wouldn’t even know. A very nice wall I’ve run into. Well, it always happens at some point. I might have to go delete everything from when Vlad decides to go to the Palace, but before doing that, I figured to spend some time seeing if I could get past that wall.

I’ve mentioned before that when I hit a wall, I never break through it: I just push a little, then a little more, then a little more, and at some point I notice that it’s behind me. So, time to settle in and start pushing. This was liable to be several days for very few words.

First push: Vlad makes an author intrusive remark about having no plan. Second push: a brief summary of the situation. Then I fell back on what all the experts say you should do when stuck: play some computer solitaire. Okay, not all the experts say that. But I did, and let me say in passing: I may not be a great writer, or a great musician, or a great poker player, but if you ever go up against me in 2-suit Spider Solitaire, you’d better bring your A game. In any case, I got push 3: Vlad realizes just exactly where and who he is, and suddenly gets nervous.

One of my favorite things to do are digressions: just stop dead and explain something to the reader. I felt very much like doing that here, because sometimes it helps get the wheels turning again and because I always enjoy it, but I didn’t have anything to digress about—I mean, if you’re going to stop cold and just infodump the reader, it has to be necessary, or at a minimum useful information at that time, and it has to be fun. (H/T Teresa Nielsen Hayden) So, nope. No infodump.

Push 4: A quick check-in with Loiosh.

Push 5: A Teckla can emerge from the room; that isn’t unreasonable. And the only reason for a Teckla (who doesn’t work at the Palace) to be there was he was an informer reporting in, so Vlad now knows at least which room he’s looking for. And there will of course be someone in it, although I don’t think Vlad wants to meet that person. Maybe do something clever with Loiosh and Rocza? Yeah, they’ve been pretty neglected in this story so far, and Loiosh has been complaining about it. Okay, then.

And, lookie there! The wall is behind me! That was, by the way, three irritating days to do all that trivial nonsense to get me past the wall, but it worked and I was on my way, with a plan and everything. The plan was to find information on informers, get some names, and deliver those names to Jules as leaders of the uprising, resulting in the Empire deciding Jules was a traitor and getting him killed in a deliciously ironic way. I now had a pretty clear vision all the way to the end.

I had locked all the doors near the Imperial Library, where Vlad was waiting, so now, to carry out my plan, I had to go unlock them all. Amazing how many doors you can unlock by deleting one sentence and replacing it with another. After that, it was just a matter of opening a door, letting the jhereg in, and running like hell. Vlad did, waited, talked to Loiosh, entered the room that he did not know was called “Third Floor Relic,” got what he was after (names of some of the informers and Jules’ real name and address; for the informers I chose one Teckla, two Fenarians, and a German; also decided to make Jules a Czech), and he was out of there, clear of the Palace, and safe. Safeish.

At Loiosh’s request, he ate some shrimp to celebrate, because I was craving shrimp. That night I made something sort of halfway between shrimp fra diavolo and shrimp primavera, which satisfied my craving, while Vlad had some fried shrimp with lemon butter which satisfied Loiosh’s.

The next step was finding Jules’s house. Now, Dragaeran technology is all over the map, because one thing I enjoy is playing with, “Okay, magic would have slowed down the development of that technology, speeded up the development of that technology, and not effected the other one.” And, to make matters worse (= more fun = better) there is often a difference between Dragaeran levels and Human levels of technology; all of which is to say, the equivalent time when the Vlad novels are set could be anywhere from 12th Century Western Europe to 19th Century North Africa, with occasional dips as far as the 20th Century, depending on what we’re discussing.

What does this have to do with addresses? Well, time to hit Wikipedia again. Numbering houses started with the distribution of property ownership in France in the 16th Century, but didn’t start getting organized in Europe for another couple of hundred years. What with messengers, and some form of postal service, I figured Dragaerans were there; but Easterners were not. So, no addresses. So, a few minutes to figure out how to describe the location of a house before street addresses were a thing. That done, I had to go back and insert that into the information about Jules.

And from there, it just sort of wrote itself all the way to the end, ending with Vlad finding the murder weapon and deciding to return it to Lachi. I finished the first draft at 11:51PM on April 16th. It came in at 6274 words.

Then a quick pass of revisions.

> It’s after dark, Steve. You know it is after dark because the neighbor complains about being woken up. So, hey, how about doing the light spell BEFORE you describe the Easterner? Wouldn’t that be smart?

> Okay, minor, but funny: I stared at a sentence a long time trying to figure out what it meant before realizing that “patience” should have been “patients.” I chuckled. I’m glad I’m able to amuse myself.

> Threw in a reference to Norathar because it needed to be there. Then I deleted it because it really didn’t.

> Sometimes I words out

Word count after revision was 6349.

The whiskey bell rings two hours before bed time. Bed time, right then in my whacky, ever-shifting sleep schedule, was 3am. I finished revisions at 23:55. And it was the 17th! How perfect is that? If I believed in omens, that would have been one.

In the evening of April 30 I had a zoom meeting with my critique group: Emma Bull, Pamela Dean, and Will Shetterly. They liked the chapter, but, as always, had some suggestions, none of which I could disagree with. I won’t mention the bits they liked, because that isn’t the point of this post, and because if I started bragging about the good stuff I’d lose my status as a card-carrying Minnesotan.

The next day I set about implementing them: I added a bit more to the walk to the physicker’s house; the idea was to establish more of a connection between Vlad and Jules, and I don’t know if I accomplished that, but I think it was worth it just for a little bit more of Vlad being Vlad.

I also slowed things down a bit with the physicker. In the original version, Vlad learns that later another patient came in and that’s how Jules overhears him being described as an informer; but there was no reason not to have the patients there already. This required adding a bit of dialog establishing that it was Jules who killed her, but I wanted a bit more anyway, so that was fine.

Another comment was that I rushed through the scene at the physicker’s after the killing; in particular, there should be more dialog with Noish-pa, resulting in more emotional investment in Vlad for getting Jules. Or, as Emma put it, an opportunity for Vlad to feel things he didn’t expect to feel.

I’d thrown in a brief paragraph about a potential tactic for dealing with an enemy, but it never actually came up, and it went nowhere, so as per Emma’s suggestion I deleted it.

Will correctly pointed out that the entire second half was too rushed—I think that tends to happen when pantsing after I finally figure out what’s going on, so I went back and gave the story room to breath.

As I was scanning through making the fixes, I came across the conversation with the drunk and his friends where Vlad learned that Jules was an informer. It seemed a little too terse, and in addition I enjoyed the group, so I added a little more dialog, both to establish that the physicker was well known and liked, thus raising the emotional stakes a bit, and because it gave me a chance to use some Hungarian curses. I mean, how can you not love, “May a snail fall into his intestines”? (Or, if you prefer, Hogy a csiga essék a beledbe. I miss my dad; he’d have loved that.) Another great one is, “May a guitar grow in your stomach and cancer strum it,” but I didn’t use that one.

I was also told that Aliera’s response to Vlad’s wisecrack was weak and un-Aliera-like. Yeah, I realized that had been nagging at me, too at an unconscious level, so I kicked it up a notch.

Pamela pointed out that earlier, Vlad is concerned about Cawti, and then once he gets involved in heading to the Palace, forgets about her, so I sent Rocza off to keep track of her and protect her.

Emma made the observation that when Vlad is in South Adrilankha he resists being an Easterner, and when he is the City he resists being Dragaeran. I’d never noticed that before, but she’s right, so on reaching the Palace I needed to play that up just a tiny bit, which I did by making a point of how everyone he passed was taller and stronger than he was. And then he made of point of stroking his mustache. I think that might do it.

Arriving at the Palace, I got the suggestion, I think from Will, to add more sensory details, and to give the reader a bit of the feeling of the place. So I jumped in after Push 4 and provided some details as well as mentioning the kind of breeze you sometimes get in big buildings, which I threw in as a callback to the opening of Jhereg. Sense details would have been useful when I was pushing the wall, too; why didn’t I think of that?

Next, a minor tweak to make it clear when Vlad breaks the window that he’s breaking the window. I almost always remember, when there is a glass window, to mention that fact, as glass is unusual and expensive, but this time I forgot, so I put that in.

Next, there was some confusion about exactly what Loiosh was doing, so I slowed that part down a bit and put in a few more details.

Last thing was some uncertainty that the Empire would do what Vlad wanted them to do, so I stuck in a mention of giving the name to Cawti as a failsafe.

Now, this is not actually the final form; this is pretty close to the form I’ll submit it in (my critique group will have another crack at it when they go over the whole book), but then my editor, Claire Eddy, will probably have some things to say about it. Anyone curious enough can then compare the version here with the published version and see what changes they suggested.

Then I went through the whole thing one more time. It was interesting that, when I just starting, I wrote that the events took “a couple of days,” when in fact I had no clue what would happen or how long it would take, but in fact, yeah, the whole thing lasted a couple of days.

I also added a little to the line in “Fenarian” that Jules says when saying he can’t speak it. I had him say “I am a visitor here” but get it wrong. The Hungarian word for visitor is látogató; change the g to r and you get “watchtower” so that’s what he says. As I said above, it is good that I can amuse myself.

This version was finished around 2PM EDT on May first, and hit about 7000 words.

And that’s how I do it. Sometimes.

Please note: I am NOT asking for feedback on the story itself; in particular, I am not asking for a critique. My writers group will go over it again, and so will my editor. Unless you are one of those people, please do not offer suggestions; I get unreasonably snarky about that, for which I apologize.

Profile

jazzfish: Jazz Fish: beret, sunglasses, saxophone (Default)
Tucker McKinnon

Most Popular Tags

Adventures in Mamboland

"Jazz Fish, a saxophone playing wanderer, finds himself in Mamboland at a critical phase in his life." --Howie Green, on his book Jazz Fish Zen

Yeah. That sounds about right.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags