Paul Thurrott Might Write a Book on Markdown
May. 4th, 2026 10:58 pm![[syndicated profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/feed.png){kind=small}
daringfireball_feedPaul Thurrott:
I may or may not write and publish a short e-book about Markdown sometime this year, most likely as part of a monthly focus. But l’ve written small parts of it already, as I do, and I figured it might be interesting for at least some readers. And so here’s an early draft of an introductory chapter that may or my not be called “On writing.” We’ll see.
It’s odd how things turn out in life. Thurrott’s and my careers are almost uniquely parallel, but have seldom intersected. This book would have been a very surprising outcome to me, if you’d told me about it 20 years ago. But better this than me writing a book about something Thurrott created in 2004.
★ Y Combinator’s Stake in OpenAI
May. 4th, 2026 10:47 pmdaringfireball_feedSpeaking of companies with valuable minority stakes in AI companies, there’s one thing that stuck in my craw about the blockbuster Ronan Farrow / Andrew Marantz investigative piece on Sam Altman and OpenAI last month for The New Yorker. It didn’t come up during Nilay Patel’s excellent interview with Farrow on Decoder, either.
Sam Altman was the president of Y Combinator for several years, and left to become the full-time CEO of OpenAI. The New Yorker quotes Y Combinator co-founder Paul Graham multiple times, in the context of Altman’s trustworthiness. (Some of those quotes are firsthand, others secondhand.) Graham’s role in the story — particularly his public remarks after publication — comprised an entire section in my own take on the New Yorker piece, wherein I concluded:
I would characterize Graham’s tweets re: Altman this week as emphasizing only that Altman was not fired or otherwise forced from YC, and could have stayed as CEO at YC if he’d found another CEO for OpenAI. But for all of Graham’s elucidating engagement on Twitter/X this week regarding this story, he’s dancing around the core question of the Farrow/Marantz investigation, the one right there in The New Yorker’s headline: Can Sam Altman be trusted? “We didn’t ‘remove’ Sam Altman” and “We didn’t want him to leave” are not the same things as saying, say, “I think Sam Altman is honest and trustworthy” or “Sam Altman is a man of integrity”. If Paul Graham were to say such things, clearly and unambiguously, those remarks would carry tremendous weight. But — rather conspicuously to my eyes — he’s not saying such things.
The thing that stuck in my craw is this: Does Y Combinator own a stake in OpenAI? And if they do, given OpenAI’s sky-high valuation, isn’t that stake worth billions of dollars?
OpenAI was seeded by an offshoot of Y Combinator called YC Research in 2016 — when Altman was running YC. In December 2023, the well-known AI expert (and AI-hype skeptic) Gary Marcus wrote the following, in a piece on Altman’s trustworthiness in the wake of the OpenAI board saga that saw Altman fired, re-hired, and the board purged in the course of a tumultuous week:
After poking around, I found out that “I have no equity in OpenAI” was only half the truth; while Altman to my knowledge holds no direct equity in OpenAI, he does have an indirect stake in OpenAI, and that fact should have been disclosed.
In particular, he own a stake of Y Combinator, and Y Combinator owns a stake in OpenAI. It may well be worth tens of millions of dollars; even for Altman, that’s not trivial. Since he was President of Y Combinator, and CEO of OpenAI; he surely was aware of this.
So it’s well known that Y Combinator owns some stake in OpenAI. But how big is that stake? This seems like devilishly difficult information to obtain. I asked around and a little birdie who knows several OpenAI investors came back with an answer: Y Combinator owns about 0.6 percent of OpenAI. At OpenAI’s current $852 billion valuation, that’s worth over $5 billion.
Graham and his wife Jessica Livingston are two of Y Combinator’s four founding partners. The fact that Paul Graham personally has billions of dollars at stake with OpenAI doesn’t mean that his public opinion on Sam Altman’s trustworthiness and leadership is invalid. But it certainly seems like the sort of thing that ought to be disclosed when quoting Graham as an Altman character reference. A billion dollars here, a billion there — that adds to up the sort of money that might skew a fellow’s opinion.
The land where time stood still
May. 4th, 2026 10:18 pmunsung_feedIt’s hard to be in charge of continuity on a movie set. It would already be difficult under the best of circumstances: after all, you can’t freeze the sun in the sky, prevent hot drinks from going cold, cigarettes from extinguishing themselves, or entropy in general from doing all the stuff it loves doing.
But on top of that, scenes are shot out of sequence, and movies are shot out of sequence. There are pick-ups if you’re lucky, and reshoots when you’re not. About the only time your job will be noticed is if you mess up: cue Super-man’s reverse CGI moustache, Josh Trank’s Fantastic Four wig situation, Commando’s damaged-then-pristine Porsche, and so on and so on. (This 7-minute YouTube video is a great walkthrough from an expert.)
Apple famously freezes time on their phones in all the promotional materials to be 9:41am. The specific moment they chose is a celebration of the first iPhone unveiling to be at around that time, but it also makes production easy – while people won’t mind that the time on the screen doesn’t match the current time, or even that it doesn’t seem to advance at a normal rate, they will definitely notice if you happened to splice two screenshots with different time side by side, just because you didn’t anticipate that splice as you were preparing them. So it’s easiest just to avoid this situation altogether.
But what I didn’t realize until today as I was recording the previous post’s screengrab is that 9:41am is also enforced whenever you record your phone’s screen via QuickTime. It’s a peculiar feeling: Start recording, and the time on your phone jumps to 9:41. Yank the USB cord out, and it’s back in sync with the universe:
Oh yeah, the date changes too, for the same reason – to January 9, 2007.
In a time-honored Apple tradition, I can’t decide whether I’m annoyed at it (there seems to be no option to turn it off), or admire it.
The Booksellers is a 2019 feature-length documentary film...
May. 4th, 2026 09:51 pmkottke_org_feedThe Booksellers is a 2019 feature-length documentary film about antiquarian and rare book dealers; you can watch the whole movie for free on YouTube.
Google Owns a Big Chunk of Anthropic
May. 4th, 2026 09:40 pmdaringfireball_feedThe New York Times, back in March last year (gift link):
To win the artificial intelligence race, Google not only has developed its own technologies, but has also pumped money into prominent A.I. start-ups. And to preserve its competitive edge, Google has kept its ownership stakes in those start-ups a secret.
Court documents recently obtained by The New York Times reveal Google’s stake in one of those start-ups, Anthropic, as well as how its investment in the young company is set to change. Google owns 14 percent of Anthropic, according to legal filings that the A.I. start-up submitted as part of a Google antitrust case. But that investment gives Google little control over the company. The internet giant can own only up to 15 percent of Anthropic, according to the filings, and Google holds no voting rights, no board seats and no board observer rights at the start-up.
Still, Google is set to invest an additional $750 million in Anthropic in September through a type of loan known as convertible debt, according to the filings. The companies agreed to the convertible note in 2023. In total, Google has invested more than $3 billion in the A.I. company.
Anthropic’s latest funding round — a rare Series G — valued the company at $380 billion. So let’s say Google has invested $4 billion to date, and Anthropic really is worth $380 billion. Google’s slice of that would be worth a little north of $50 billion, quite the return on investment. And competitively, there’s a heads-they-win (with Gemini), tails-they-don’t-lose (with Claude) aspect. Maybe that’s not the best metaphor, since OpenAI would make it a three-sided coin, but still.
(Via today’s subscriber-only Stratechery update, where Ben Thompson noted this in the context of Google last week reporting a 30% increase in operating profit year-over-year, but an eye-popping 81% increase in overall profit. The difference was the growth in their investments, almost certainly Anthropic in particular.)
App Store Search Ads and the Slippery Slope
May. 4th, 2026 09:09 pmdaringfireball_feedJeremy Provost, on the blog for Think Tap Work, his mobile app development company:
iOS App Store search is no longer about relevance. It’s about ad inventory. With Apple’s introduction of a second search ad, for any query where we weren’t #1, we’ve effectively moved down one position. [...] If you’re counting at home, roughly 70% of the interface is covered in ads. A casino ad, to boot.
That was a month ago. Two weeks later, he posted a follow-up, showing the effect on Think Tap Work’s apps in the App Store:
I wanted to share some updated numbers from our own apps. To isolate the impact, these numbers only include App Store Search impressions from iOS devices, comparing Mar 26–Apr 8 to the prior two weeks. In other words: how much visibility we’ve lost in search.
- Morpho Converter: 26% decrease
- Pop Out Timer: 23% decrease
- Attendant for Zoom: 30% decrease
- Participant: 3% increase. As previously mentioned, we advertise Participant using Search Ads. It’s not surprising that it might be getting a bump from this change.
The screenshot in his follow-up shows another casino ad, this time in a search for “Roblox”. Kinda gross.
Here’s Wikipedia on the “Zero-One-Infinity Rule”:
The zero-one-infinity (ZOI) rule is a rule of thumb in software design proposed by early computing pioneer Willem van der Poel. It argues that arbitrary limits on the number of instances of a particular type of data or structure should not be allowed. Instead, an entity should either be forbidden entirely, only one should be allowed, or any number of them should be allowed.
In Apple Notes, you can only have one main window open. In Apple Mail, however, you can open as many Viewer Windows as you want. Both are compliant with the Zero-One-Infinity rule. An app that allowed you to open multiple viewer windows — but no more than some arbitrary limit — would not be. ZOI is a very good rule of thumb.
I feel like a variation of Zero-One-Infinity is a good rule of thumb for ads, too. From the perspective of users — and probably developers — zero was the best number of ads for Apple to show in App Store search results. One was worse but acceptable. But now that they’re showing more than one, they’re on their way to infinity. They’ve started down the slippery slope. Remember when Google only showed one ad in search results?
Anyway, who’s looking forward to ads in Apple Maps this summer?
The vision of persistence
May. 4th, 2026 09:22 pmunsung_feedI want to show you something glorious. This is Bear, the note taking app:
There are desktop apps that get flustered if you ⌘+Tab away and back, misplacing focus or closing a dialog box inside. There are iOS apps that fully reset themselves whenever they get swapped out of memory and have to be reloaded.
But Bear, right here, remembers which note you were on, and exactly where you were in that note, even between phone reboots.
Software is transient and malleable, and one of the hard parts is knowing when that’s beneficial and when detrimental. In real life, you can leave a notebook on your desk, open on a certain page, leave a pen pointing to a specific word – and then depart for a two-month trip to Europe. You will find your notebook exactly how you left it. Why shouldn’t software behave this way?
Also, another thought: This is very likely not something users will complain about when broken, or suggest when absent, even if you go out of your way to open yourself for feedback. Just swapping an app out of memory is hard to understand and “repro” (in engineering parlance). There’s a certain design mindset and taste necessary to notice and care, and a certain vision to carry it through.
The lack of direct user feedback doesn’t mean it’s not worth doing. It just means that there are some things that designers and only designers will know how to properly weigh, describe, and prioritize. If you have a few design-minded users that actually send you feedback like this – treasure them. But most likely this will have to come from “within the house.”
To me, it’s clear that within Shiny Frog (the makers of Bear), there are people who care about this kind of stuff, and leadership that trusts them. Kudos.
The Big Idea: Matt Harry
May. 4th, 2026 08:42 pmscalziwhatever_feed
In his new novel Ashland, author Matt Harry posits a world that is a little bit… gooey. If you don’t know what that might mean, or what it would mean for anyone who has to live in that world, never fear, Harry is here to get you up to speed. Here, put on this protective clothing before we go any further.
MATT HARRY:
Science fiction is riddled with tropes. The mad scientist, the killer robot, the first contact with aliens. My personal favorite has always been the concept of gray goo – an end-of-the-world scenario envisioned by K. Eric Drexler in his 1986 book Engines of Creation. Basically, it centers on the creation of a self-replicating technology that grows and grows until it devours all the biomass on Earth.
It’s a pretty depressing concept, but one that never seemed particularly feasible to me. How could a single organism affect the entire globe at once? Then the Covid-19 pandemic hit. Everything shut down and everyone shut themselves inside. As I walked through the empty streets, I found myself pondering a simple question: How could this be worse? That was immediately answered by a follow-up question:
What if we never went outside again?
Such a dystopian idea, I realized, could be due to my own version of gray goo. I considered a lot of options: nanotechnology, viruses, alien organisms. I reached out to an infectious disease doctor and a robotics expert for inspiration. Eventually, I came across an invention that blends multiple fields – organic microbots. These tiny organisms are created in a lab and programmed to perform simple tasks, such as drug delivery, pest control, or anticancer treatments.
But what would happen if these microbots went rogue? That question led me to create the Ash. This self-replicating swarm of organic microbots is developed to destroy cancer cells, but a programming error leads it to target muscle proteins instead. Of course, the Ash gets out, and twenty percent of humanity is killed in the first month. To survive, people are forced to seal themselves inside plastic-coated buildings. If they have to go outside, they need to wear hazmat suits or use remote-operated drones.
Now that I had the what and the why for my dystopian world, I needed the where. Since I’ve lived in Los Angeles longer than I’ve lived anywhere else, I decided to make my hometown the main setting for Ash Land. LA is a sprawling, sunny, outdoors-oriented city, so it felt particularly brutal to trap everyone inside.
Finally, I needed a who. What sort of character could I toss into this dystopian nightmare? A romantic seeking connection? An action hero? Eventually, I decided that a detective would be a fun choice. Trying to solve a mystery while the protagonist is unable to collect evidence or interrogate suspects in a normal manner immediately gave me lots of ideas. To make things a bit easier, I imagined someone pretty similar to myself: middle-aged, father of two boys, loves pop culture and solving a good puzzle. Unlike me, I decided to make him a divorced ex-cop and a pain in the ass. (For confirmation on that last part, you’ll have to talk to my family.)
Every day during the pandemic, I would drive around my then-five-year-old son, trying to get him to fall asleep so I could write for a couple hours. I would park somewhere scenic, and look out over the empty City of Angels while imagining a scenario much worse than my current one. It was oddly therapeutic. The concept of Ash Land led me to develop all kinds of near-future trappings: air locks on every entrance door, transport pods nicknamed coffins, a dangerous gang of scavengers known as Scrappers, and a system of sealed walkway tubes that leads to Griffith Observatory.
Ultimately, I tried to create a gray goo scenario that is plausible, unique, and will hopefully remind readers of humanity’s resilience. After all, if our world can weather Covid-19, I believe we can find a way to fix our other problems, too. Ideally it won’t take a swarm of flesh-eating microbots to make us do so.
Ashland: Amazon|Barnes & Noble|Bookshop|Powell’s
New Banksy: Blinded by Nationalism
May. 4th, 2026 08:32 pmkottke_org_feed
The artist Banksy has installed (without a permit, one assumes) a new statue in London that depicts a man in a suit marching off off a ledge, blinded by a flag.
The artwork has been dubbed Blind Patriotism, although Banksy, enigmatic as always, doesn’t explain the meaning of his latest work. However, many have interpreted it as satirising the rise of nationalistic fervour in the UK, typified by the populist politician Nigel Farage and other forces on the far right.
Another bullseye for Banksy. 🎯
Designer Jenny Volvovski’s collection of...
May. 4th, 2026 07:48 pmkottke_org_feedDesigner Jenny Volvovski’s collection of unsolicited book cover designs. “I really wanted to design book covers but didn’t have any book cover work. So I hired myself to redesign my personal library.”
‘Noir, Japan’s Hard-Boiled Bittersweet Answer to Oreos’
May. 4th, 2026 07:48 pmdaringfireball_feedJake Adelstein (author of Tokyo Vice) on his blog Tokyo Paladin:
For decades, Japan’s Oreos weren’t made by Nabisco at all. They were produced domestically by Yamazaki Biscuits, under a licensing arrangement with what eventually became Mondelez International. This was, by most accounts, a reasonable arrangement. The cookies were local. The quality was consistent. Nobody was complaining.
Then Mondelez did what corporations do when things are working fine. The license expired, and Mondelez moved production of the Oreos it sells in Japan to China, exporting them to Japanese wholesalers and retailers. A cost decision. A spreadsheet decision. The kind of decision made in a room with no windows and a very good projector.
Sensitive Japanese consumers noticed quickly — the taste had changed. Into that opening stepped the Noir, inheriting the flavor the old Oreo had left behind.
Yamazaki Biscuits launched Noir in December 2017 as the successor nobody had officially asked for and everybody apparently wanted.
I have a great affinity for Newman-O’s, which I’ve previously described as “the cookies Oreos pretend to be”. Turns out though I’ve mostly sung the praises of Newman-O’s on my podcast and social media, not here on Daring Fireball. I love Newman-O’s, never tire of them, and will fight any man who argues that Oreos taste better. In fact, late last night, when a friend texted me with a link to this story from Adelstein, I was by sheer happenstance eating a few Newman-O’s. True story.
But now I’m fascinated by the existence of these Japanese rivals. A spite Oreo called Noir. They look and sound delicious, but they seem difficult to obtain in the U.S.
Photoshop’s ‘Modern User Interface’ Sucks (and Doesn’t Feel Modern)
May. 4th, 2026 07:13 pmdaringfireball_feedMarcin Wichary at Unsung:
I’m angry. (Clearly.) We should all be angry in face of stuff like this. This is how people get fed up with software — because it feels unstable and deteriorates on its own without needing to.
I know I brought up that an existing power user base can be a huge pain in the ass, and I am a decades-old Photoshop power user. But this is different than other examples where the product needs or at least wants to evolve past its core audience or toward a different market. For Photoshop here, nothing I see indicates any change in course or clientele — and yet all of these good moments in UI that used to help me out no longer exist.
Plus, all those transgressions are solved problems. Those issues are not buried in pages of heavily litigated patents, or in seven collective brains of world-class interface designers whose driveways are presently occupied by cash-filled trucks sent over by frontier companies. This isn’t some long lost art that requires archaeologists to decipher. This feels like carelessness and laziness in face of basic UI engineering; in a likely internally-motivated effort to refresh the interface, the team threw an entire nursery worth of babies with the bathwater.
The before-and-after screenshots look like examples from a lecture on user interface design — if you swap them around make the new ones “before” and the old ones “after”. Better balance, better focus behavior, appropriate platform-native typography.
(Shades of Héliographe’s devastating critique of the history of the app icon for Pages: “If you put the Apple icons in reverse it looks like the portfolio of someone getting really really good at icon design.”)
I’m not a fan of the first part of this music...
May. 4th, 2026 07:02 pmkottke_org_feedI’m not a fan of the first part of this music video (reminds me too much of dipshits I had to endure at school), but the single-take choreography from ~4:18 is great.
According to this peer-reviewed paper, the...
May. 4th, 2026 06:24 pmkottke_org_feedAccording to this peer-reviewed paper, the “screeching sound of peeling tape” is caused by tiny sonic booms. The speeds at work here are in the range of Mach 0.7–1.8. Supersonic crafts!
Anthropic Executive, One Year Ago: Fully AI Employees Are a Year Away
May. 4th, 2026 06:20 pmdaringfireball_feedSam Sabin, writing for Axios one year ago:
Anthropic expects AI-powered virtual employees to begin roaming corporate networks in the next year, the company’s top security leader told Axios in an interview this week. [...] Virtual employees could be the next AI innovation hotbed, Jason Clinton, the company’s chief information security officer, told Axios.
Agents typically focus on a specific, programmable task. In security, that’s meant having autonomous agents respond to phishing alerts and other threat indicators. Virtual employees would take that automation a step further: These AI identities would have their own “memories,” their own roles in the company and even their own corporate accounts and passwords.
Unlike Anthropic’s ambitious prediction regarding the vertiginous rise in AI code generation, this one, I think we can say, has fallen flat on its face. This isn’t how companies are using AI — or at least they shouldn’t. But contra Axios’s year-ago headline (“Exclusive: Anthropic Warns Fully AI Employees Are a Year Away”), this wasn’t a warning. It was an advertisement — and exactly the sort of wink-wink-nudge-nudge software-brain “warning” that has tanked public sentiment regarding AI. It wasn’t an indication that Anthropic actually believed there would exist “fully AI employees” today, but rather that they wanted to build enthusiasm amongst the sort of ghoulish “let them eat cake” executives who really wish that they could “hire” fully AI employees.
I’m terrible at receiving negative feedback — and am spiraling from my 360 review
May. 4th, 2026 05:59 pmaskamanager_feedA reader writes:
As part of a leadership development opportunity offered by my organization, I’ve been given the chance to participate in a 360 review process. For context, I report to a member of the C-suite and have been angling for a promotion (which would entail a new role basically being created for me), and the 360 was brought up by my supervisor and our CEO as a growth investment.
I consider myself to be very self aware, so most of the things that came up in the process are not surprising to me, but I’m also very sensitive to criticism, especially from higher-ups. I am very professional and am able to calmly hear the feedback when it’s given, but with this 360, I’m finding myself spiraling. I received the written summary and skimmed the positive, but have read and reread the criticisms. I’m devastated to see the critical feedback from C-suite members in particular, and now have a twofold challenge: one, how do I become better at hearing critical feedback without taking it so personally? And two, how do I get the most out of what is being billed as a leadership/growth opportunity and transform the critical elements of the 360 into something constructive?
Years ago, I was coaching a manager with a similar sensitivity to criticism, who was similarly upset about the feedback in a 360. Interestingly, when I read it through, the majority of what was in there was positive, but she couldn’t stop focusing on the (relatively small amount of) things people thought she could do to improve, and she felt like a failure. I asked her to take a yellow highlighter and highlight everything positive — which left her with a document that was about 90% yellow, which made it visually impossible for her to ignore the actual balance of the input her colleagues had offered, despite what her brain had been trying to do. She has told me in recent years that she still keeps that highlighted document as a reminder for herself.
Can you try something similar and see if that changes the way it’s landing with you? I’m sure you don’t think that you’re flawless or have no areas where you can grow, and if you can correctly place those areas within the broader context of all the things people say you do well, it generally gets a lot easier to feel comfortable with this type of document as a whole, and to see it realistically.
The other thing is: we all have areas where we can do better, and it’s actually a favor for people to be willing to tell you what those are! I know the whole “feedback is a gift” framing feels cheesy … but feedback really is a gift if you’re someone who wants to get better and better at what you do. I was going to add “as long as they offer it reasonably politely,” but I actually think even feedback that’s not diplomatically stated can be a gift, if you choose to see the value in hearing unvarnished input.
That’s true even when you disagree with the feedback — because, if nothing else, it gives you useful info about how you’re coming across to someone else. You might ultimately consider that info and decide it doesn’t matter, but it’s still valuable to have it.
The post I’m terrible at receiving negative feedback — and am spiraling from my 360 review appeared first on Ask a Manager.
NASA has released some 12,000 unseen photos from the...
May. 4th, 2026 05:40 pmkottke_org_feedNASA has released some 12,000 unseen photos from the recent Artemis II mission; here are some of the best shots.
The Contiguous 41 States
May. 4th, 2026 04:59 pmkottke_org_feed
Nowhere on XKCD’s map of The Contiguous 41 States does it say that you need to find the missing seven states, but that’s immediately where my mind went. And it was a little more challenging than I anticipated — all of New England is present & accounted for somehow?
The answer key is here, along with this tidbit:
The United States did have exactly 41 states for a few days in 1889, from the admission of Montana, the 41st state, on November 8, to the admission of Washington (the state, not DC), the 42nd state, on November 11.
See also this super-sized US map with 64 states.
And then after I wrote all of the above, I decided to check and of course I’d posted about this map before, soon after it came out. *sigh*